The problem of tlous remastered it's not the game itself. It's one of the best games from 7th gen and it's good to have the choice to enjoy it on the 8th gen for the first or second time.

The problem is that Sony uses this remastered to cover a hole of months without good games, do you think people (specially) ps3 owners buy a ps4 to play the same game again?

People buy systems for new games. If they want to play last gen stuff get a PS3 or use PSNOW. Remakes of games are okay by me as long as they arent used as a vehicle to sell more DLC(TLOU, GTA). They are not ok by me if they are taking away from the release new games or used as an excuse for devs not to make new games.

I measure it based on the extraordinary amount of EA Access posts I have been asked to moderate, combined with my own observations of the prevelance of bashing comments and threads. Bearing in mind EA Access has been newsworthy for all of two weeks, if that, I'd say its not even close.

I have no intention of counting anything though, but if you'd like to go through that, be my guest

Damn, I think in 3 years we will still see threads of people trying to justify the existence of Last of Us Remastered, which is just going to bring the "hate" out with it.

Also, how on Earth are the two related at all? Especially since Sony, the ones bringing LoU HD, are not allowing PS4 owners to have that choice of EA Access.

QUOTE TREES KIDS!

Fair enough.

In a sense, both offer gamers choice. If that is the beginning and end of the question this thread raises, then the answer is self-evident.

@bolded I repeat: NOT ONLY MICROSOFT FANS LIKE THE SERVICE. 

When I say "we like it" it literally means "the people who like it". There are Sony and Nintendo fans that like the service too.

The first words in this thread are literally EA Access. Did you expect me not to talk about it or something? If you try to compare the two in the OP/title then do it right. 

Kind of tired of threads about TLoU:R whether it be defensive or criticism. THis is becoming the next TitanFall topic, though not quite that bad.

Correct me if im wrong but i believe people's complaints with TLoU stems from the price more than anything.  YOu know people complained about Tomb Raider's price as well 

Is that really something to complain about though? Yes, TLOU: remaster is a port of a year old game. Yes, it's not necessary to buy the game if you already own the PS3 version. But an improved version of the game with added bonuses (DLC) for $50 isn't bad. I just don't see why its getting focused on so much lately. There are lots of other titles that get a remaster that don't get half the effort put into it (Resident Evil.REmake anyone?), that get ignored entirely.

About covering the hole.. It takes time to port a game to another system, optimising the engine, adding improvements to it etc. Sony and their WWS are hard at work at developing future titles. TLOU just so happens to fill the gap between a quiet period.

For EA access, its a little too early to make a judgement. Though the price for it ($30) seems fine. But yeah, it really depends how frequent the games release (and quality of games) to see if its worth subscribing for.

For some reason people think I'm having a go at EA Access which I'm not. I find it quite ironic that people come here saying they hate people constantly defending TLOU:R while at the same time defending EA Access when nobody is even attacking it.