Roma said:
lol at the haters
at first it was "Nintendo does not make new IP".
hater is presented with list of new IP. hater be like "um uh, well the names are crap and the majority don't even have a sequel"
hater is then shown that the majority do have sequels but then says "uh um those are e-shop games so they should not be included" or "they never left Japan" or "the developer came up with the idea while he was taking a dump so those don't count"
keep on spinning! :D
the list is to prove that Nintendo has made lots of IP over the years not if it has sequels or if they are physical copies or digital |
I've seen you do this one too many times recently, so I'd like to point something out to you.
Saying something not positive about Nintendo by using proper arguments, does not automatically make one a hater, the same way that not liking a director for the movies he's been making the last 5 years also doesn't mean that someone is a hater. Eg. while a hater will say that Tarantino is the worst, never made a good movie in his life, a 9-year-old can make a better movie, etc, a non-hater will say that he liked Kill Bill 1, but not 2, that his movies up to Grindhouse were awesome, but after that he hasn't done anything groundbreaking, etc.
Perhaps you should consider the possibility that not every non-Ninty fan is in fact a hater and what we have in this thread is not spinning as you constantly put it, but a different, equally valid opinion.
While haters do exist, are they really any better than people that see everything black and white with Ninty (or whichever company) never being at fault?
If I were you, I'd spend less time talkng about haters and more using proper arguments to counter theirs.
Just a thought.
You're Gonna Carry That Weight.
