True but there still is a problem. The industy is also obsessed with mario games.
True but there still is a problem. The industy is also obsessed with mario games.
Lawlight said:
|
You asked what they innovated, he gave examples, you completely ignore them.
Nintendo used Motion Controls on the Wii, a Touchscreen on the DS.
They made a lot of creative games with those options, yet you act like its nothing.
What great thing did sony do in the last few years that completely changed the industry?
If you're interested in Nintendo content and understand german, maybe you want to take a look at my youtube channel! :)
RealGamingExpert said:
Nintendo used Motion Controls on the Wii, a Touchscreen on the DS. They made a lot of creative games with those options, yet you act like its nothing. What great thing did sony do in the last few years that completely changed the industry? |
The great thing Sony did in the last few years is that they DIDNT try and change the industry, and thats why they have a consistent and larger fanbase.
I'm not sure where the idea that change > improving on something people already love comes from. That might be the case once in a century, but other than than people have certain expectations.
That's why I roll with the Sony + Nintendo combo. Deadly stuff.
Playstation = The Beast from the East
Sony + Nintendo = WIN! PS3 + PSV + PS4 + Wii U + 3DS
fps_d0minat0r said: The great thing Sony did in the last few years is that they DIDNT try and change the industry, and thats why they have a consistent and larger fanbase. I'm not sure where the idea that change > improving on something people already love comes from. That might be the case once in a century, but other than than people have certain expectations. |
Exactly. Im not saying that this is a bad thing, but he asked for innovation and got his answers.
Sony works like this since years, so why change a working concept?
Quote Tree Shortened - Conegamer
If you're interested in Nintendo content and understand german, maybe you want to take a look at my youtube channel! :)
brendude13 said: Almost nothing but Nintendo 1st party titles certainly isn't something I'd consider a "balance". Playstation and Xbox are not dominated by military shooters at all. |
Bold: sad but true
Underlined: there is diversity in each platform. I do think Nintendo is more in a different level of gaming than the others, because they have a strong emphasis in their unique creations.
Nintendo does bring a lot of uniqueness to the industry.
With that said, they don't really have to "balance" the industry. There are a ton of other genres if you look for them.
fps_d0minat0r said: The great thing Sony did in the last few years is that they DIDNT try and change the industry, and thats why they have a consistent and larger fanbase. I'm not sure where the idea that change > improving on something people already love comes from. That might be the case once in a century, but other than than people have certain expectations. |
They didn't try and change the industry? What about Heavy Rain, isn't that taking a huge risk in money to create something so odd for the time? And what about Jorney, AR with Eye Pet, upcoming Morpheus, Unfisnished Swan, the Pupeteer...And I could go on and on about telling you the risky games/moves Sony keeps doing over the years. Don't you try blur things up and deny.. it's pretty visible.
RealGamingExpert said:
The ignorance is strong in this one... |
Yep its blalant ignorance at its finest. I don't why anyone bothers responds to that guy he's just here to a make scene. There's a word for that but, alas I don't want to get banned in my own thread so I won't use it.
Even in this thread, people are arguing console war bullshit and of course it's spearheaded by Lawlight.