My comment was used as a "mirror". 

Like "read my comment please and do you realize how dumb that comment is? same with yours"    nothing else.

It was as constructive to the conversation as the comment I replied to was.

Was not supposed to be smart or whatever.

How does the PSN's shortcomings make Nintendo's pitiful online services any better? Where's the logic in such a line of thought?

Wheres the logic in replying to something with a question when  the question was answered 1 comment earlier?

If you fail at something your failure is not altered or alleviated in any way by the failure of others, simple? Your statement makes no sense and simply "acting as a mirror" or whatever your "logic" was is simply baffling.

Nintendo
Online playing is worst on nintendo games .

You dont understand what I am saying.  How has NIntendo shitty online? It does not. I have no problems with Mario Kart whatsoever. Saying  "Nintendo just sucks at online" is a lie and was not the smartest reply one could make. It deserved an answer of same style. It was not worthy of a better reply imho because that comment had no other purpose than to attack Nintendo.

I looked at his most favorite console which according to his profile is PS3 and then replied with the same kind of comment regarding that favorite console.  My comment was never supposed to show how sony failed (which it does not anymore obviously) but  more like a "I know what you did there and I can do it too  so what was the point in doing it? Noone gained anything from it its just dumb" My reply had actually nothing to do with Sony or its failure. it was just a random thing based on his favorite console (if Wii would have been the console then I would have had a hard time trying to write a reply like that tho xD)

But actually you can look at Sony and Nintendo and comapre them. Why?
 People complain about Nintendo's online service even tho they would not be able to make a better online service themselves.  IMHO its make it better or stfu.
And they just say it sucks because they COMPARE it to the competition  "hey look the competition has better online"  but as soon as you show them the competitions flaws its suddenly "you cant compare them  what does MS/Sony have to do with Nintendo?"

Double standards everywhre.

I hope this reply clarifies what my intention was (I also never expected everyone instantly understand it)

@JazzB1987

I play on PC and I have access to features that the competition doesn't (at no additional cost to me). As far as I am concerned all of the consoles have mediocre / poor online and Nintendo has the weakest offering. Just because you think it is adequate doesn't really make any difference. Also, the whole "IMHO its make it better or stfu" is frankly perplexing. Nintendo should be directly compared to the competition for the simple fact that this is the decision I actually make when purchasing a console. If a feature is inferior to their competitor then I count that against the product and by extension the manufacturer. It doesn't matter if you agree or not that's just how things work. I'm glad that you enjoy playing Mario Kart 8 online and that you don't have any issues but until I can jump online and cross-game chat with my friends while playing my music and games simultaneously I will view the system's online capabilities as sub-standard.

IT HAPPENED AGAIN! GARRR!!! We're supposed to get a new router tomorrow. Hopefully it'll fix the issue.

Considering AT&T is my provider and I've been logged out of ARR three times today because of their shitty router?
Yeah, AT&T.