By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Would Nintendo buying Capcom solve all their problems? Will the others ever allow Nintendo to do this?

The shareholders would never allow any of the big three to muscle in and assert authority over Capcom. Just because that particular countermeasure is no longer in place doesn't mean it's a free for all and doesn't mean there won't be any resistance to a buyout. It's naive to claim "X company should just buy X company" when we don't know the details and the complexities involved in the process.



Around the Network

It would make sence to buy them. Some very popular IPs would help shift a few consoles for ninty.



I love Capcom and Nintendo, but Capcom really isn't worth the investment from Nintendo.

Nintendo already basically has the Monster Hunter IP exclusive.

Resident Evil is way past its prime and couldn't save the GameCube 10 years ago, it won't do much now.

Street Fighter has an OK following but its not what it used to be at its peak either.

Megaman is as niche as Star Fox these days. So they have three IP way past their prime and one that Nintendo already has.

Nintendo would be better off just investing in new studios to be honest and letting them make new games.



So Sega should get Capcom then?



In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank

spurgeonryan said:
gergroy said:

Good heavens no. Nintendo would just lose money and probably have to lay off 75% of the staff at capcom. Any of the console makers buying capcom is just a bad idea...



ehhh...Reasons? Capcom is a really good investment. With Monster Hunter there would be no layoffs for a while. Plus, do you think it would be any different anywhere else?


Well, obvious reason is right now capcom has the value of a multiplatform developer.  You reduce that output to a single console ecosystem and you cut revenues significantly.  That immediately reduces the value of the company resulting in an immediate loss.  Also with nintendo struggling with hardware currently, any impact from capcom ip's would be negligible.  Also, nintendo audiences arent the best for some capcom ip's like resident evil.  We saw on the gamecube that resident evil struggles on nintendo platforms.  Then there is the redudancy in staff when you take out the multiplatform development.  Tons of people would lose their jobs, and as revenue decreased, even more would lose their jobs.  You also run into the problem that as a publisher, you can only develop so many games before you start competing against yourself and take sales away from your own games.  Nintendo is pretty much already at capacity as a publisher, they start pushing more games out their games will start having a lower ceiling of sales.  That would probably mean Nintendo would have to cut back on their own output of games.   

So yeah, bad idea.  Same goes for every console maker really.  



Around the Network

"In the event that Microsoft, Sony, or some other company even allows Nintendo to buy such an amazing and important company. "

ms and sony are in no position to "stop" nintendo.

answering the thread's title: It would solve all of CAPCOM's problems. for nintendo, it would be a great adition.



torok said:
Nintendo buys Capcom:
1 - Nintendo buys Capcom by X per stock
2 - Nintendo announces that Capcom software will be exclusive
3 - Stock falls hard until X/2 or X/3. Nintendo can't even sell Capcom anymore.
4 - Software sales fall because it is on less platforms.
5 - Income falls hard. Nintendo can't cut costs without mass layoffs but that would be impossible without expending fortunes to do everything according to working laws.
6 - Capcom sucks Nintendo money and selling it to other now would add mass losses.

Replace Nintendo with Sony or MS if you like. The only way that this wouldn't happen is if a neutral 3rd party buys it. People criticise Nintendo for not buying Atlus, but is a similar story than this one, it simply doesn't work the way people would like it. When you buy an IP, it's good, you can do games. When you buy a company, you get the IPs, the personal, their structure and a bunch of problems. You buy healthy business, not sick business. MS bought Rare because they were healthy and are way smaller than Capcom, it's more manageable. Nintendo buying Capcom would just push them to financial problems, exactly what would happen to MS or Sony. Just like THQ, nobody wanted a sick company that was losing money. When they went down, others just grabbed their IPs without worrying with ressurecting a dying company (not saying that Capcom is dying, they just need some restructuration efforts).

That's totaly not how it works.



It would create more problems than it'd solve, I think I'm repeating myself quite a bit today, but Capcom is a horrible investment for any of the big 3.



Zero999 said:
torok said:
Nintendo buys Capcom:
1 - Nintendo buys Capcom by X per stock
2 - Nintendo announces that Capcom software will be exclusive
3 - Stock falls hard until X/2 or X/3. Nintendo can't even sell Capcom anymore.
4 - Software sales fall because it is on less platforms.
5 - Income falls hard. Nintendo can't cut costs without mass layoffs but that would be impossible without expending fortunes to do everything according to working laws.
6 - Capcom sucks Nintendo money and selling it to other now would add mass losses.

Replace Nintendo with Sony or MS if you like. The only way that this wouldn't happen is if a neutral 3rd party buys it. People criticise Nintendo for not buying Atlus, but is a similar story than this one, it simply doesn't work the way people would like it. When you buy an IP, it's good, you can do games. When you buy a company, you get the IPs, the personal, their structure and a bunch of problems. You buy healthy business, not sick business. MS bought Rare because they were healthy and are way smaller than Capcom, it's more manageable. Nintendo buying Capcom would just push them to financial problems, exactly what would happen to MS or Sony. Just like THQ, nobody wanted a sick company that was losing money. When they went down, others just grabbed their IPs without worrying with ressurecting a dying company (not saying that Capcom is dying, they just need some restructuration efforts).

That's totaly not how it works.

Explain how it works then.



All this capcom nonsense is well out of hand and much ado about nothing.