By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Lets talk about Final Fantasy Type-0 NOT being on Vita.....

Tagged games:

 

Would you buy FFT-0 on Vita,PS4, or XBO?

Vita 119 56.40%
 
PS4 63 29.86%
 
XBO 23 10.90%
 
All of the Above 6 2.84%
 
Total:211
DerNebel on 12 June 2014
tiffac said:
DerNebel said:
Why anyone would want to have a game on the Vita when they could instead get the same game on the big screen on a more powerful system, which gives more possibilities to the developers, is completely beyond me.


(Raises hand)

Does Playstation TV count? ^^

That's not a more powerful system than the Vita now is it? ;)

If given the chance between getting a game on a handheld or a console I'd always choose the console, I just don't like handhelds and the Vita is especially pointless to me, since you acn play almost only games that you can also play on the big screen through other platforms.



Around the Network
tiffac on 12 June 2014
DerNebel said:
tiffac said:
DerNebel said:
Why anyone would want to have a game on the Vita when they could instead get the same game on the big screen on a more powerful system, which gives more possibilities to the developers, is completely beyond me.


(Raises hand)

Does Playstation TV count? ^^

That's not a more powerful system than the Vita now is it? ;)

If given the chance between getting a game on a handheld or a console I'd always choose the console, I just don't like handhelds and the Vita is especially pointless to me, since you acn play almost only games that you can also play on the big screen through other platforms.


Well sadly for me work has become a killer duty. The Vita and the 3DS has  become my companions because I'm always on the go and I could never get to use to gaming on my phone. As much as I love my consoles, I see them less and less. So to me handhelds has its advantages.



forevercloud3000 on 12 June 2014
DerNebel said:
Why anyone would want to have a game on the Vita when they could instead get the same game on the big screen on a more powerful system, which gives more possibilities to the developers, is completely beyond me.

Why does anyone like gaming on Handheld? I like not being shacked to a TV while I enjoy my games. Graphics aren't much of an issue on a screen of that size. Just like FFX/X-2 HD, for that screen the graphics are comparable. Vita version retained all the features as well. I prefer to play any game with the option on Vita rather than PS3/4 so I can have Netflix playing too(TV Shows and Movies work better on big screen).

I also have to commute to work,so I specifically get Vita version so I don't have to stop playing just cuz I left home and gives me something to occupy myself with for the ride.

Portable versions have plenty of purpose.



      

      

      

Greatness Awaits

PSN:Forevercloud (looking for Soul Sacrifice Partners!!!)

Xxain on 12 June 2014
Aerys said:
There is nothing to say, i dont know what Yoshida did to Square enix boss, fucked his daughter maybe? Because it's absolutely not a rational decision, the game would sell much more on Vita in Japan than on PS4 and in the west, that is the game every gamer on Vita is waiting.




Xxain on 12 June 2014
Aerys said:
There is nothing to say, i dont know what Yoshida did to Square enix boss, fucked his daughter maybe? Because it's absolutely not a rational decision, the game would sell much more on Vita in Japan than on PS4 and in the west, that is the game every gamer on Vita is waiting.


TAKE 2:

This is not aimed at Japan though. This is aimed at western Final Fantasy fans and they choose platforms based on popularity. Vita and handhelds in general are below the popularity of consoles. The amount of entitled whining is shocking. SE is being portrayed as these guys plotting against Vita and its just not case. The "Vita fan" moniker has to go because Vita fans, are psp fans, who are ps console fans, who are the brunt of of FF fans, who are definitely ps3 owners, who probably own ps4, and if they dont... They WILL. I can understand if this was exclusive to wii u, pc, or xb1, but it is not. You are not being forced to buy anything you dont already own or will own. Type 0 is for FF fans not console specific fans.

I just think that the real issue here is that everybody thought Vita finally got something that would boost its popularity but reality happened... Knda like the MH3, DMC4, and ff13 multi plat fiasco.    



Around the Network
JWeinCom on 12 June 2014
forevercloud3000 said:
JWeinCom said:
forevercloud3000 said:
JWeinCom said:
The Vita has a very small install base in the West, and Sony has shown no real desire to grow that install base. No reason for any other developers to waste their time and effort.


Soul Sacrifice Delta, Freedom Wars, Invizimals, Murasaki Baby, Oreshika all from Sony 1st Party this year. Not to mention Shahid(resident Vita Go Getter) is behind so many 3rd Parties trying to get them to make games for Vita, scoring things like Tales of Heart R localization, Borderlands 2 Vita.

but yea, Sony isn't supporting their own handheld.........


Soul Sacrifice is a double dip on a game.   Murusaki Baby is a small little indie game.  Oreshika is not developed by Sony.  Actually, none of those three games are developed by Sony.  But if you call that and a, by all accounts, buggy and dated ports of Borderland 2 support, that's your call. 

Soul Sacrifice Delta is pretty much a sequel. It boasts new game mechanics and it's own expansive story and a graphical boost. Its more sequel than MonHun iterations and no one seems to be bothered by those...

Murusaki Baby being a small title is irrelevant. Still a game

Oreshika is a 1st Party IP Published by Sony, but made by Alfa(this fact is also irrelavant)

Borderlands 2 is a highly requested title by fanbase. It has been/will be patched for stability. Not a big deal if you are interested in this game on the go.

Sony also has other games in Development still for Vita. They haven't stopped all 1st Party production like with PSP.

1.  "Pretty much a sequel" indicates that it reuses a lot of the same content.  Developed by Comcept I believe?

2.  Made by Alfa is very relevant as it shows that Sony is not willing to devote their developers to Vita titles.  There is nothing necessarily wrong with funding third party projects, but you should also be developing games in house. 

3.  Was there really a clamor for Borderlands 2 two years after the original release?  If so why didn't anyone buy it?  Even bundled with the Vita sales are pitiful.  Shows how much being a highly requested title would mean for type 0 I guess.

4.  Oh do they?  They could have fooled me with their E3 presentation.  They haven't stopped all production, but their production is exceedingly low.  Their support, if you want to call it that, is basically the bare minimum. 

Honestly is Sony putting their best effort into making the Vita a success?  If they're not, why should a third party invest in the console? 



Mirson on 12 June 2014

Can't we just be grateful that Type-0 is finally getting a western release? Moving it to the new generation of consoles was probably the only way to renew interest in a PSP game and less risky than releasing it on the Vita.



forevercloud3000 on 13 June 2014
Mirson said:

Can't we just be grateful that Type-0 is finally getting a western release? Moving it to the new generation of consoles was probably the only way to renew interest in a PSP game and less risky than releasing it on the Vita.

No we cannot

When you were a child and all you ever wanted was a Pony and then for Christmas your parents get a Pony.........for your sister. 

That is what this feels like.

Vita owners made the ruckus FOR the Vita, and we got totally overlooked. Vita owners buy up good games, contrary to what some want you to believe. It would have sold well. For reference, look at FFX/X-2 HD numbers on PS3 vs Vita, a Square Enix game no less.

I am not saying it should be Vita exclusive.... but not even Vita/PS4/XBO? I would bet money that a Vita/PS4 would drastically outperform a PS4/XBO. FF sales were one sided when the twins were neck and neck, whats it gonna be now that PS is double Xbox? This is why it is annoying they totally left Vita owners out in the cold with this one yet again.



      

      

      

Greatness Awaits

PSN:Forevercloud (looking for Soul Sacrifice Partners!!!)

RenCutypoison on 13 June 2014
Mirson said:

Can't we just be grateful that Type-0 is finally getting a western release? Moving it to the new generation of consoles was probably the only way to renew interest in a PSP game and less risky than releasing it on the Vita.


My toughts exactly. But asking for squre fans to be grateful to square is naive, they haven't done it since ps1 era.

Handeld -> Homeconsole is an upgrade IMO, and people really wanting to play it on vita will be able to.

As a SE fan and vita owner, I don't feel the slightest betrayed, because I never actually tought the game would be on vita. I'm just happy I'll be able to play it.



0815user on 13 June 2014

if this new version of type-0 could run on the vita, there should be a port. if SE plans to make a serious upgrade tough, then not. so can we please wait for the first trailer before we decide to nuke SE and/or sony?