Yeah that won't happen. It would be a nice alternative, but I'd expect most people to just go for that option since the PS+ offerings have been pretty weak as of late.

So i got advanced warfare here are some impressions

SNIPERs ARE COMPLETELY FKED. they get STOMPED on so HARD, everyone jumps around like frogs and you cant do jack shit and get this...you need 500 long range kills to complete your camo challenge, yet iv gotn over 200+ kills and less then 10 of them have been "long range kills" its like the maps are too damn small to get them SIGH (i mostly play FFA btw, cause if i loose i can only blame myself)

if you're not sniping its actually pretty good, better then i thought it would be (100x better then that turd ghosts) graphics are really good id say alot better then BF4 and ghosts, but not quite as good as shadowfall

here is some images from share button (images arent 1080p cause i got them off my phones ps app)

those look pretty good actually. i have faith in sledghammer for some reason, maybe because this is there first time and they need to do a good job to prove them selfs.

as far as sniping goes, GOOD. snipers in COD has always been a pain in my ass. they were overpowered as shit and quick scoping was a turd. let snipers be snipers, which is supposed to be hard. snipers in previous CoD could always overpower assault rifles in short distance fight, which never made sense. im SO glad about this news. 

I agree with Chev. Snipers need to be buffed up. The maps are way smaller and the movement speed has been increased, this is a game and not an interpretation of real life, all weapons need to be balanced.

The only way snipers would overpower assault rifles in older cods was if a greater skilled player was going against a lesser skilled player, all those youtubers who had quickscope montages had horrible K/D's despite being great at quickscoping.

doesnt change the fact that it there is a possibility that a sniper can take out a assult in quick range. quick scoping made no sense. snipers were one shot one kill and they could take out AR easily. it didnt make sense. they were way over powered. people now seem to be just complaining because snipers are made the way they should be. hard. 

That possibility doesn't mean it is overpowered, the assault rifle has always been the most viable option when compared with the sniper as it is much easier to use at close and medium range. People just complained because those who practiced and were good with the sniper were killing them which they see as "unrealistic" even though COD isn't trying to be realistic. Any random player can't just pick a sniper and go around getting kills quickscoping, but random players can choose an SMG or assault rifle and run around the map spraying their gun for kills.

This is an arcade shooter with loadouts and there needs to be a balance. This isn't ARMA or to a lesser extent battlefield who are trying to be realistic with their gameplay.

Actually, I just did that... A friend was getting a PS+ subscription, so I gave him $10 to allow me to share it with him.

Now I have PS+ for online play, but no ability do DL games, which I'm fine with. $10 for a year of multiplayer gaming is a goid deal for me...

Xbox fans wanting an award for not making any PS4 is dead topics. Yet

give me my cookie!!!

Xbox fanboys all over the chartz now, it's amusing to watch some of them have to be from MS marketing department. I refuse to believe some of those threads are made by people that are not paid to do so....