That's laughable! You can't be serious!? I have no clue about res. or framerate, I just about couldn't care less, but if you are trying to say that no one in this thread is defending Sony because Sony is their white knight, then you are probably one of them yourself.

This is the same for every company/console maker, trying to deny it is foolish.

Coincidentally, it's people who don't have the PS4 as their favoured console who are condemning and bashing the game for not being 60fps.

Two sides to a coin.

Indeed they are the only ones bashing. Especially the one who never had a PS3 or Vita either, curl-6.

And I've never denied that. 

Really, I don't see why you're telling me this. 

I'm damn sure it will be 30fps. The first one looked so damn good on 360, it will easily look stunning on Xbone. But I doubt it will look as good as DC - actually I think it will look, well, "different". Technically I expect it to be somewhat inferior, of course. Especially if it isn't 1080p it will have no chance on forum-discussions.

For the same reason you're telling him this. *rolleyes*

This game s free, who cares what the framerate is... If you had to pay $60, then you can complain!

He denied it, I didn't. 

Wow, this thread really escalated I must say...

Whole thing seems to be just going around in circles if you ask me. But let's not attack users, please.

I disagree, Immersion and variety offered by dynamic time of time and weather does a lot more to the gameplay than 60fps. Plus a solid 30fps is better than trying to reach 60 fps in a racer and then end up with screen tearing or regular drops to 30 or 40fps with v-sync. Screen tearing is ugly and distracting, drops to 30 fps disorienting, drops to 40fps a bit better but requires double buffering, thus added input lag. All add judder.
To get a stable 1080p60 they probably would have to cancel the dynamic day/night lighting, or drop the res to 720p. Both not worth it to me.