Wagram said: As part of the ban, Sterling is not allowed "to attend any NBA games or practices, be present at any Clippers office or facility, or participate in any business or player personnel decisions involving the team." Is that even legal? He's the owner. |
The owner of a franchise, though. Just like the legal owner of a McDonald's restaurant could still be "fired" by McDonald's, since he licenses the right to use the McDonald's name even if the land and facilities belong to him. Sterling and other franchise owners "license" the right to participate in the NBA (otherwise owning a team is worth only a fraction of that), pursuant to NBA rules and conditions, including probably a morality clause (a contractual bit saying "don't say/do stuff that will make us look bad, even in your private life,"), and now that he is in breach of that, he loses his right to participate in the NBA.
I think what they legally can't force him to do is sell the team, but noname's the lawyer here, not me.
The part i also wonder is that they're fining him and lifetime banning him. Seems like the latter makes the former hard to enforce, unless he's under contract to abide by such fines.