By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Why Is Nintendo Considered For Children?

 

Do you consider Nintendo for children?

Yes 207 49.52%
 
No 211 50.48%
 
Total:418

The irony is that teenagers (so still children) are far more interested in mature games like FPS because they seem more adult. I am 37 years old and have been gaming for 30 of those years and although some violent games are some of my favourites FPS have lately been boring the shit out of me.
I mean, just how many times can you shoot something before being sick of it?
A "kiddie" game like Mario paradoxically has more depth than it's cartoon graphics would have you think and therefore appeal to adults as much, if not more than kids......



Around the Network
ktay95 said:

Just watch TV ads, never will you see Nintendo aim at an 18+ audience.


GameCube/GBA era had the whole "who are you?" campaign that seemed to be targeted at a late teen/young adult audience.

unless you're including that demographic in "children".

but i can't think of any non-children marketing from Wii onwards. 



spemanig said:
Video games are for children.


Yep. Too bad some believes grey and brown makes this mature.



Proud to be the first cool Nintendo fan ever

Number ONE Zelda fan in the Universe

DKCTF didn't move consoles

Prediction: No Zelda HD for Wii U, quietly moved to the succesor

Predictions for Nintendo NX and Mobile


Nintendo points itself towards people who want to have fun and not look at blood and guts and guns and tits and death and brown and grey.



jibbyjackjoe said:
Nintendo points itself towards people who want to have fun and not look at blood and guts and guns and tits and death and brown and grey.


So, basically -- children! 

And to be serious, I find it very narrow-minded when people, in this instance Nintendo defenders, equate mature content with killing and nudity. But once they dare look outside their closeminded world of vivid cartoon characters, theey might discover other interesting ideas. 

Oh, and sorry, but if you are an adult and don't like nudity, something is not right...



Around the Network
BuckStud said:
awesomeabe1998 said:

I was wondering this almost ever since I got a Wii U. Now I know Nintendo have franchises with cartoon mascots like Mario and Donkey Kong but why is Nintendo childish for having these franchises while Sony has Knack, Little Big Planet and had Crash Bandicoot? Is it the name "Nintendo" that bugs people? I have never seen a child who mastered Call of Duty or BF master Mario.

So what is it?


There's a certain age group of people out there that will say that Nintendo systems are for kids.  These are the same people who wait in line at midnight to pick up the latest call of duty so they can cap another human in the head at 1000 yards.  I'm well past that age and will tell you that anyone who says that Nintendo consoles are only for kids are ignorant.  I would say that Nintendo console systems are excellent for the whole family.

I study color theory at school and marketing schemes. Nintendo is primarily and foundationally aimed at children and families. I studied color theory for what attracts children women and males and people in between. Nintendo consoles are for everyone but are  marketed to children and families. 



generic-user-1 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
generic-user-1 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:


So you say, but a lot of Nintendo fans who might not want alternative consoles might want to play them. This is the end Nintendo has forced upon them because of their bubble like development they've had with their consoles and its not just Bethesda. You can lash out at as many devs as you want until you realize whose fault it really is. Their games are buggy, but they might not be this gen and it doesnt mean they arent fun either. Its not good to write off company just because the company you favor is closed off and never became an option.


im in love with bethesda for over 10 years. i realy like the games, but tey are realy realy buggy and that will not change.

if u play em vanilla it just sucks.

Thats the truth. I almost gave up on playing their games on consoles all together, but it didn't stop me from having fun once I got over half of the console glitches. Skyrim and Fallout were masterpieces.



When you make the statement including the words family friendly and a Nintendo fan replies to that statement saying why is Nintendo just for kids like that's what you even said, you know even Nintendo fans themselves think it's a children's system.



tripenfall said:
The irony is that teenagers (so still children) are far more interested in mature games like FPS because they seem more adult. I am 37 years old and have been gaming for 30 of those years and although some violent games are some of my favourites FPS have lately been boring the shit out of me.
I mean, just how many times can you shoot something before being sick of it?
A "kiddie" game like Mario paradoxically has more depth than it's cartoon graphics would have you think and therefore appeal to adults as much, if not more than kids......

QFT. And even when I was a FPS fan, I preferred Duke Nukem 3D, with its easy-going, humourously over-the-top and parodic style to Quake II, that despite being excellent and pioneering in many things, took itself so seriously to paradoxically become less believable than the Duke.
About Ninty, as I already wrote, I think it's more perception rather than reality: its systems are perfectly capable of any kind of games, and since Ninty ceased strongly censoring third parties too, they have adult ones too, but its image is kiddy because its marketing is and most of its biggest games and franchises either are very children-friendly or they have kiddy graphics even if they are targeted also at adults. This wouldn't be a problem it wasn't overwhelming. Adult people not unsecure can perfectly accept that part of their game libraries most important games have funny cartoony graphics, but if they are the vast majority even people self-confident enough could start feeling not totally at their ease, or even if they still are, they could feel they aren't the intended target of that system.




Stwike him, Centuwion. Stwike him vewy wuffly! (Pontius Pilate, "Life of Brian")
A fart without stink is like a sky without stars.
TGS, Third Grade Shooter: brand new genre invented by Kevin Butler exclusively for Natal WiiToo Kinect. PEW! PEW-PEW-PEW! 
 


S.T.A.G.E. said:
generic-user-1 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
generic-user-1 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
VanceIX said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
VanceIX said:
Nintendo's policies on leaving out violence and sexuality is a reason they are sadly seen as children-only consoles. I personally appreciate their games, it's a fresh breath from the mindless gore and violence filling todays games.

However, it's also a reason why violent (but amazing) games like the Elder Scrolls and Fallout won't be coming to Nintendo consoles anytime soon.


Elder Scrolls isnt coming to Nintendo consoles nor fallout because no Nintendo console has ever been up to par when they launched the titles on consoles. Nintendo is a non-entity because they don't play ball with the third party who push the limits. Nintendo though loved in the 90's was considered a joke to the PC realm and not even considered a threat at all. It wasnt until Sony that the PC realm became threatened, hence the Xbox.

I agree that Nintendo consoles have always been seriously underpowered, but even with the power to match the other consoles games like the Elder Scrolls and Fallout series won't come to Nintendo's consoles because of their strict and overbearing policies towards violence. 


Third party and second party can make mature games and RPG's for Nintendos consoles. There is no barrier outside what Nintendo creates for themselves. Mass Effect 3 was on the Wii U was it not?  Nintendo doesn't make mature titles themselves and thats the way they like it. The first party that Nintendo makes is what truly represents them, but they welcome third party as long as third party takes the back seat to their vison alone. Sony and MS get all the top third party titles because they work with third parties to make the consoles work well for both of their ideals.

As Bethesda said themselves on Bonus Round (on Gametrailers.com). Nintendo is to blame for the loss of certain games on their consoles because they did not take the time to prep the consoles according to not only what they had planned but what third parties had planned. Nintendo once again created an underpowered console and then asked third parties to make titles for it after, hence why you see the last gen games mainly surfacing on the console. Nintendo damned themselves.


bethesda games are made for the PC... they are so freaking buggy and ugly that u need tons of mods to make em run and look fine.


So you say, but a lot of Nintendo fans who might not want alternative consoles might want to play them. This is the end Nintendo has forced upon them because of their bubble like development they've had with their consoles and its not just Bethesda. You can lash out at as many devs as you want until you realize whose fault it really is. Their games are buggy, but they might not be this gen and it doesnt mean they arent fun either. Its not good to write off company just because the company you favor is closed off and never became an option.


im in love with bethesda for over 10 years. i realy like the games, but tey are realy realy buggy and that will not change.

if u play em vanilla it just sucks.

Thats the truth. I almost gave up on playing their games on consoles all together, but it didn't stop me from having fun once I got over half of the console glitches. Skyrim and Fallout were masterpieces.


skyrim even on an older pc with just some mods and fixes is just so much better.

the shroomkingdom mod is sooo great...