95% of my gaming library is used games. I don't find it wrong.
| spemanig said: I don't care where the money goes. I'm here to play games, |
The first sentence doesn't seem to match with the second sentence. By that logic, you should be caring where the money goes, in that you should care that the money goes into making more games for you to play
Technically no, but I in general tend to avoid used games when I can for other reasons.
I don't buy used games unless the game is older making it either:
A) Impossible to find
B) More than the launch price
Then I'll buy used. Not because of feeling bad or anything but because I don't trust used copies. I don't know what the condition will be considering I buy my games online.
I don't find an issue with anyone else doing it though.
Kresnik said:
|
And yet I don't. Hm.
Buying used games helps recycle games that are barely worth half its retail value of $60. If you are against buying used games, why not rent the game or wait for it to reach $20 or $30 in the discounted/bargain bin?
I buy new games because I like my games new, and for no other reason than that.
I buy used games if they're no longer available new.
I don't mind buying used EA or Activision games to be perfectly honest! 
---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---
No because I believe in a free market.
Heres a more interesting question....
Is it wrong for companies to prevent you selling your digital game licence to someone else?
There is nothing wrong with it.
When you buy a used game, you are buying another entities property. The intellectual property was already paid by the first purchaser. They do not have a right to the physical property they already sold and they never will have.
I consider immoral to just think otherwise. Imagine i write a book and sell it to you. The next person that buys the book will have to pay you and me, now multiply for several times for each copy. I would be getting money for nothing. Theres is no more sale on my part. Its immoral and shouldnt even be considered.
Imagine you buy a sugar candy. You give it a lick and dont like it and give it to your brother. Alas your brother would have to pay for that candy again before he licks it. Does it make any sense at all?!
Another one of those little abuses the videogames companies try to push us towards. Digital goods should be allowed to be resold aswell. I am pretty sure that was decreed in Europe, but isnt enforced.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
WHO IS JESUS REALLY?