By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Website Topics - [Staff] The gamrConnect Community and How We View Avatars and Signatures

Tagged games:

 

Smeags got that Ban hammer ready.



Around the Network

No matter what I will stick by my avatar. FOR GLORY.



Consoles: 3DS, Wii U, and Vita soon. Super Paper Mario fan.

gooch_destroyer said:

 

Smeags got that Ban hammer ready.

Casualties so far... 1 2



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

gooch_destroyer said:

 

Smeags got that Ban hammer ready.





Smeags said:
gooch_destroyer said:

 

Smeags got that Ban hammer ready.




...Holy crap!



Around the Network

Hurray! Maybe i can actually browse this site at work without having to make sure my screen is completely covered and nobody is around me now! Where were you guys last year when I was having an issue with this!



spurgeonryan said:
Axumes' Trucks, Nyanks, Carls, avatars need to go as well. Especially the half naked men. They offend me and my girlfriend wonder what I am doing.Please handle soon Smeagsy.

^_^ <3


"You can still have a beautiful woman in a swimsuit, but ask yourself this: Is this picture's goal to get a sexual response from the viewer? If it is, then it's not VGChartz material."

It depends on the context. A woman on a beach taking off her bikini top will be looked at in a different light to someone doing cosplay and showing a bit of cleavage. A picture of Katy Perry, topless, grabbing her tits will be looked at in a different light to a picture of a videogame character.

Certain avatars have been looked at and its been decided that they were "over the line". Yours was one of them. More are to come.



                            

How's my avatar :)?

It has to be either white dress or bodysuit Shurelia :P



Squeezol's Fanclub Member? is that how it works?

Why can't I hold all these no gaemz?

Always looking to improve my awful drawings ;_; 

I just hope my avatar of the MSF soldier in his sneaking suit doesn't break any guidelines. Sneaking suits can be... provoking sometimes.



Carl2291 said:
spurgeonryan said:
Axumes' Trucks, Nyanks, Carls, avatars need to go as well. Especially the half naked men. They offend me and my girlfriend wonder what I am doing.Please handle soon Smeagsy.

^_^ <3


"You can still have a beautiful woman in a swimsuit, but ask yourself this: Is this picture's goal to get a sexual response from the viewer? If it is, then it's not VGChartz material."

It depends on the context. A woman on a beach taking off her bikini top will be looked at in a different light to someone doing cosplay and showing a bit of cleavage. A picture of Katy Perry, topless, grabbing her tits will be looked at in a different light to a picture of a videogame character.

Certain avatars have been looked at and its been decided that they were "over the line". Yours was one of them. More are to come.

And Trucks and axums? Definitely sexual response avatars. Topless men.

 

I have never really cared, but you guys should be consistent.

 

Edit: A good avatar of this kind would be Seece's