Just to clarify:

The statement, "No games for Japanese Gamers" is invalid for use as a point of argument. Its borderline racist, assuming that Japanese gamers only, play Japanese games, as well as unfounded as preference is subjective and cannot be proven objectively. An equivalent statement would be that the only RPGs Japanese gamers play are JRPGs.

The correct statement, "Few Developers on Y catering to the Japanese Audience(Mainstream)", even its exaggeration, "No Developers on Z catering to Japanese Audience (LOL)" is more right then the "No Games" statement.

It is factualy correct and doesn't present a bias against Japanese gamers.

In fact, this argument can apply to any market.

"Few Developers on Y catering to the X Audience" where Y is the console and X is the intended Audience.

The equation is quite simple:

h(Y) + ad( y) -d( y)

where h is the hype function, which consists of the expectations of the system

ad is the alleged developer or future developer support in ys market.

and d is current developer support in ys market

and y here is the performance of a console in a particular market

No games ! = 0.

0(nogames) · 1(nogames) · 2(nogames)... · x(nogames)

So 0 = no developers.

I'm in a little bit of a rush so maybe I missed something entirely, but the moment you call something an equation and it's not really an equation, you kinda have lost some credibility in my eyes. Just for the record, an equation is generally where you have a '=' with stuff on its both sides.

Its truly logic which is basically a subset of mathematics.

If, then is basically equivalent to "="

...Couldn't you make your point in a more simple way?

the OP gave me a boner for some reason

FakeMathsPhilia ?

maybe...

Don't bring logic into these forums!

I came to this site to get away from math, not do more