Seece said:
So Uk isn't anti Nintendo? It's Anti home console that isn't Wii and Gamecube Nintendo. Gotcha. |
I in no way insinuated anything like that, idk where you got that from. Also you have not provided Gamecube numbers and stated there are no exact figures and yet you just said it sold well there. If your gonna downplay the effect of console sales in its home country then there really is no point in continuing this, have a nice day.
Seece threads are much more interesting than other stupid threads which don't use facts. I don't care if he has a agenda or not, at least the content of his threads invite one to discuss, which is something you can't say about topics claiming Bravely Default is the best JRPG just because it's on their favorite system for example.
KingdomHeartsFan said:
I in no way insinuated anything like that, idk where you got that from. Also you have not provided Gamecube numbers and stated there are no exact figures and yet you just said it sold well there. If your gonna downplay the effect of console sales in its home country then there really is no point in continuing this, have a nice day. |
But that's what you're saying. UK is anti nintendo when you take away handhelds and the consoles that sold well. That's called cherrypicking because you have no argument.
Also, how did the advantage of being made in the US help Xbox vs PS2?? How is it helping it beat PS4? ect? It's just a ridiculous response to whenever Xbox seems to be winning at the time 'home console advantage' yet when they lose all goes quite on the western front ...
| bubblegamer said: Seece threads are much more interesting than other stupid threads which don't use facts. I don't care if he has a agenda or not, at least the content of his threads invite one to discuss, which is something you can't say about topics claiming Bravely Default is the best JRPG just because it's on their favorite system for example. |
Thanks man, I appreciate that!!
I knew it was a seece thread also before i clicked it because his name is after the thread title >.
"I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007
Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions
Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.
To be fair, the 360 launched an entire year earlier than the Wii and was badly behind it in aligned launch for many months.
Seece doesn't seem to care to recall that Nintendo dominates the handheld market while MS literally has done nothing there.
To say that Nintendo has 'lost' regions of support 3 consecutive times in a row is a gross exaggeration.
It goes more like tie, early Nintendo win, late MS win, MS taking the lead.
I predict NX launches in 2017 - not 2016
| fleischr said: To be fair, the 360 launched an entire year earlier than the Wii and was badly behind it in aligned launch for many months. Seece doesn't seem to care to recall that Nintendo dominates the handheld market while MS literally has done nothing there. To say that Nintendo has 'lost' regions of support 3 consecutive times in a row is a gross exaggeration. It goes more like tie, early Nintendo win, late MS win, MS taking the lead. |
It's not though is it? I mean lets not even get started on software sales where 360 overtook the Wii in the US a long time ago.
| RolStoppable said: It's largely meaningless. 1. The first Xbox racked up losses in the range of $4 billion to beat the GC by about 3m units worldwide. This easily secured Microsoft a spot in the top 3 failures of video game history. If you are ever in need of an example for a pyrrhic victory, the Xbox vs. GC fulfills that purpose formidably. 2. The 360 was eight years on the market before its successor was released, the Wii only six years. Not only did the Wii accumulate its sales faster, it was also significantly more profitable. 3. The Wii U will go down in history as one of Nintendo's most idiotic decisions. Analogy: If the year was 1990, then Nintendo would have launched the SNES with an Atari joystick look-alike instead of the actual SNES controller that was an evolution of the NES controller. Outselling the Wii U is no achievement. 4. Here is the real kicker: The Xbox franchise didn't come into existence to beat Nintendo. The real enemy goes by the name of PlayStation. Xbox vs. PS2 was a brutal defeat for Microsoft, 360 vs. PS3 was only a battle because Sony messed up so spectacularly (PS4 sales show how little Sony would have had to do to stay ahead of Microsoft; essentially, a $400 system), One vs. PS4 is going to be another massacre. 5. And to make this post go full circle: Nintendo is still around and they will continue to stay around, so being outsold by Xbox in a couple of countries is largely meaningless. |
what does the halo studio got to do with this?
"I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007
Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions
Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.
I'm not even touching that rol, have you got so bored you just state the blatant obvious these days? MS didn't create Xbox to combat Nintendo?? REALLY?!
Revelation.
Facts are facts tho (op) meaningless or not Nintendo can't beat MS in the homespace in the west no matter what approach they try.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
Why only concentrate on WiiU? Why not do ps4-X1 comparisons? Just saying
