No they didn't. This is why the media got on their case between 2010-2012.

This is actually  one of the reasons why I really don't take Metacritic seriously. GTA 4.. lol.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6168902

So much for "nobody else".

Crackdown caught enough to spawn a sequel (something Heavenly Sword didn't, though it did much better than the later's Enslaved even being multiplatform), and generated enough fanbase to ask for a third game. It didn't end the franchise. Hell, it still sold one million units. Take Dead Rising, for example. The first one on 360 sold two millions, the second one sold much less (I think it was 1.47 millions). Still spawned a third sequel, Dead Rising 3, for the Xbox One. But that's onto eight generation consoles. Look at Infamous, same pattern. I don't see you saying that Infamous 2 ended the franchise. What if MS announces Crackdown 3? They were indeed teasing it before this generation started.

Of course this comes on the misreading of Heavenly Sword, but still. I've explained how you were hatin' on Crackdown already (yet you seem to keep on this line), and I've explained how someone else misread Heavenly Sword too (despite you saying "no one else; don't rub your failures etc etc etc"); so this is were we stand.

And you never got to reply to my other post, on which I asked if Ps3 had some exclusive space flight simulator like Star Fox, which 360 does have. The variety between consoles isn't that drastic as some people say. 360 does have the problem that their three last years of life are nothing in comparison within its four first years of life, but still, the games are there.

I do agree with you that losing Mass Effect exclusivity was bollocks.

srry im on someone elses computer. didn't see the face.

Alan Wake was dope..
Too Human was a really fun game for me but flopped.
Forza, great
Fable
Left 4 dead
Halo
Halo wars
Gears
Kameo
blue dragon
crackdown
infinite undiscovery
prey
lost odyssey
All games I enjoyed. however looks like MS has spotted their issue and are pushing out many exclusives.

quality is not determined by sales, they are a reflection. 

Those were 11 exclusives that came out in the 2 year period following the PS3's release, but most towards the end. Just a few were actually in the first year. MS did release twice as many during that period. 

Claiming that quantity is the reason is inaccurate. Halo 3 sold 10 million copies at a point in the generation when the 360 had more exclusives than the PS3. And Killzone was not at "accessible" as Halo, because it was less of a game. The original KZ was a mediocre game, whereas Halo: CE was a genre defining masterpeice. KZ2 came out well after Halo 3, without split screen multiplayer, and with a fraction of the multiplayer features of Halo 3. To call it 'miles ahead' is to take into account only the graphics of the game, without taking into account that it's easier to make a game shiny when you remove all the overhead of 'features'. 

clearly you dont know what accessible means, and its clear when someone talking about killzone can only mention graphics and nothing else, that person hasnt played the game.

if killzone is less of a game than halo because it sold less, then XB1 is less of a console than PS4 because it sold less.... oh wait... it actually is. lol.

I and many others I know prefer xbox exclusives over playstation. Why xbox exclusives are of better quality to us is opinion and preference. I and my friends would never give up xbox for playstation.

Its just preference at the end of the day.

Sony has Virtual Reality so they automatically win.