By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - inFAMOUS Second Son’s Retail Version Differences Compared To E3 2013 Trailer

Areym on 13 March 2014

This trend is starting to rob me the wrong way. I'm sure it has been happening way before this gen but now I'm really taking importance to it. The gameplay released today look pretty damn good, but this is still troubling.



"Trick shot? The trick is NOT to get shot." - Lucian

Around the Network
badgenome on 13 March 2014
the-pi-guy said:

"more."  

There happy?





sales2099 on 13 March 2014
RolStoppable said:
sales2099 said:
It looks better in 2014. Just saying.

Of course, as an Xbox fan you have already a lot of practice in seeing such things in a positive light.

I made a complement (sincere at that), and you respond with that? How crass. Guess PS fans positivity from 2006-2008 inspired me.



Xbox: Best hardware, Game Pass best value, best BC, more 1st party genres and multiplayer titles. 

 

BenVTrigger on 13 March 2014
mutantclown said:
BenVTrigger said:

Really is mixed bag. From an art stand point I think they improved some things for sure. Delsons face for example looks slightly tweaked in a good way in terms of looks but if you zoom in on detail he clearly took a hit technically with less skin texture detail.

Also certain things like shadows took a huge hit. They may have been a little too overpowering in the earlier trailer but now they are nearly non existant.

It looks like Sucker Punch were forced to downgrade the game from a technical point of view but made some pretty great artistic choices to help cover it up.

My biggest issue is the retail version is noticably blurrier.


You deduced all that from a compressed captured video, re-compressed on the interwebs? wow, you're a fucking genius!

Actually yes.

There are significant texture / lighting / and and geometry differences between the two version. The main detail difference that compression woukd affect would be artifacting / overall blur which is why I asked earlier if both are direct feed shots.



BHR-3 on 13 March 2014

reminds me of the uncharted 3 differences



                                                             

                                                                      Play Me

Around the Network
phantom0 on 13 March 2014

lol that facial downgrade. eww



AZWification on 13 March 2014

His beanie looked better  in 2013. I am disappointed.



                
       ---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---

Shinobi-san on 13 March 2014
BenVTrigger said:

Really is mixed bag. From an art stand point I think they improved some things for sure. Delsons face for example looks slightly tweaked in a good way in terms of looks but if you zoom in on detail he clearly took a hit technically with less skin texture detail.

Also certain things like shadows took a huge hit. They may have been a little too overpowering in the earlier trailer but now they are nearly non existant.

It looks like Sucker Punch were forced to downgrade the game from a technical point of view but made some pretty great artistic choices to help cover it up.

My biggest issue is the retail version is noticably blurrier.

lol shadows didnt just take a hit they gone XD



Intel Core i7 3770K [3.5GHz]|MSI Big Bang Z77 Mpower|Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1866 2 x 4GB|MSI GeForce GTX 560 ti Twin Frozr 2|OCZ Vertex 4 128GB|Corsair HX750|Cooler Master CM 690II Advanced|

JamaicameCRAZY on 13 March 2014

Tough to tell the gameplay i saw the other day looked great. Not enough to really say the game has been downgraded graphically. Obviously those screens dont look quite as great as the 2013 ones. I'll still be getting mine.



EVERY GAMERS WORST NIGHTMARE...THE TANGLING CABLES MONSTER!

            

       Coffee is for closers!

Sweep on 13 March 2014

This is from 2014 : Downgrade anyone...?

Nope, no downgrade at all