By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Why Xbox One Will Catch Up To Playstation 4 in Performance.

4k1x3r on 10 March 2014

Guys, why are you even losing your time, for those who might not know this, these are the latest Threads created by our genius Jega.

 

So fair question, why is everyone AGAIN losing time answering him? Because it's what it is, time loss. Flat out time loss.



Around the Network
Jega on 10 March 2014
FlamingWeazel said:
Jega said:
FlamingWeazel said:
Jega said:
Another example put 512MB of ram into the PS4 and see what happens to the graphics.


LOL  how is that the same thing, then the system is ram starved, but both habe 8 gbs of ram. Take out the ps4 gpu , anyone can use hypotheticals...... Amount of ram and ram speed is not the sme thing nor relevant.  Yes you need ram, but esram wont make one system with a weaker gpu pefform better it's impossible.

 

Show me a benchmark of a PC with a 40% better gpu but slower ram where it performed worse in games? 

The PS4 GPU is said to be 50% faster than the GPU in the Xbox One. You guys really think that difference will actually translate

on your tv.

The PS4 GPU would have to be about 3x more powerful for you to see a difference in performance.

LOL we see a diff in perfromance now where have you been? COD ghosts, Tomb raider, BF4, Thief, Watch dogs..........seriously. Most games  on PS4 are processing 30-50% more pixels then x1 is. What you said is baloney, even a small GPU upgrade is noticeable, again look at some benchmarks. Why is titanfall only 792 p with Frame rate issues? Why is almost every game not a sports game way lower frame rate and resolution on x 1? It's not sdk and drivers LMAO.

It is lunacy to think 32 MB esram can offset sonys better architetur and 40% GPU compute advantage.,

 

Waiting or some benchmarks.

I already stated that the reason why you are seeing a difference in performance is because Microsoft is late with the 

Software developement KIts that will allow developers to run games in 60fps and 1080p.



FlamingWeazel on 10 March 2014
Jega said:
FlamingWeazel said:
Jega said:
FlamingWeazel said:
Jega said:
Another example put 512MB of ram into the PS4 and see what happens to the graphics.


LOL  how is that the same thing, then the system is ram starved, but both habe 8 gbs of ram. Take out the ps4 gpu , anyone can use hypotheticals...... Amount of ram and ram speed is not the sme thing nor relevant.  Yes you need ram, but esram wont make one system with a weaker gpu pefform better it's impossible.

 

Show me a benchmark of a PC with a 40% better gpu but slower ram where it performed worse in games?  HINT They don't exist, and ps4 has faster unified pool is better then slower ram with 32 mb esram. 32 is too tiny and another middleman to get to the gpu and cpu.

There you go again looking at the number and not the type of ram.

Example, both the xbox one and ps4 have 8 gigs of ram but the difference is about 100GB/s because of the type of ram

ddr3 vs ddr 5 differnt types of ram.

32MB of SRAM 192GB/s vs PS4 8 GIGabyte of ram 176BG/s, both theoretical performance.

Stop looking at just the number and look at the TYPE of ram.


The ram is NOT going to help a weak er gpu..............Again you CANNOT add up theroritical numbers like that and geta  total, it's BS and it doesn;t work like that they don't get added together.

 

I repeat, nothing can offset the GPU advantage., Everything you said is totally incorrect.,You also keep ignoring that 32 MB is simply too small to make any real difference.

 

Where is a benchamark?

I am not trying to offset the GPU advantage the PS4 has, what you are not getting is that you cannot just look at the power of

the GPU and say Playstation 4 can perform better than the Xbox One. There are other factors such as memory bandwith and CPU speeds.

If the ps4 and xbox one were made up of just GPUs then I would not have an argument.

Yes and the other facts still means ps4 is a more powerfull system, esram is too small, a hindrance, and does NOT make for more bandwidth. The ddr3 in x1 is still its'  speed, 32 mb esram is not speeding that up, so x1 has a slower main pool is NOT unified, and relying on a TINY 32 esram is laughable at best.Everything you said in other words is incorrect.

 

The ps4 does and is performing better that is simply fact.

 

You are just looking at ram and adding up numbers and trying to SPIN those numbers, PS4 has better ram and architecture on TOP oif a better gpu. Yes a better gpu is a huge advantage that will not be offset by a tiny 32 mb esram.

 

You don't have an argument, even if you were right (You are not), and say the x1 had better ram bandwidth, the x1 would still lag behind due to the gpu not being able to render at 1080-p, having less shaders, compute units, less fill rate, meaning it would still have to drop in resolution, frame rate and effects to maintain the same performance., No amount of fast ram is goiung to help the gpu, no matter how fast the ram is, it will then have to be bottlenecked by how well the GPU can render. PERIOD. Look up bottlenecks. X1 has worse ones the the ps4.



Max King of the Wild on 10 March 2014

Jega - EVERYONE is laughing at your thread and NO ONE is defending or siding with you. That sshould tell you the thread is full of misinformation and garbage. Please do yourself a favor and request a thread lock and go read the million tech threads on this and other sites that so XB1 is and always will be weaker



FlamingWeazel on 10 March 2014
Jega said:
FlamingWeazel said:
Jega said:
FlamingWeazel said:
Jega said:
Another example put 512MB of ram into the PS4 and see what happens to the graphics.


LOL  how is that the same thing, then the system is ram starved, but both habe 8 gbs of ram. Take out the ps4 gpu , anyone can use hypotheticals...... Amount of ram and ram speed is not the sme thing nor relevant.  Yes you need ram, but esram wont make one system with a weaker gpu pefform better it's impossible.

 

Show me a benchmark of a PC with a 40% better gpu but slower ram where it performed worse in games? 

The PS4 GPU is said to be 50% faster than the GPU in the Xbox One. You guys really think that difference will actually translate

on your tv.

The PS4 GPU would have to be about 3x more powerful for you to see a difference in performance.

LOL we see a diff in perfromance now where have you been? COD ghosts, Tomb raider, BF4, Thief, Watch dogs..........seriously. Most games  on PS4 are processing 30-50% more pixels then x1 is. What you said is baloney, even a small GPU upgrade is noticeable, again look at some benchmarks. Why is titanfall only 792 p with Frame rate issues? Why is almost every game not a sports game way lower frame rate and resolution on x 1? It's not sdk and drivers LMAO.

It is lunacy to think 32 MB esram can offset sonys better architetur and 40% GPU compute advantage.,

 

Waiting or some benchmarks.

I already stated that the reason why you are seeing a difference in performance is because Microsoft is late with the 

Software developement KIts that will allow developers to run games in 60fps and 1080p.

LOL Software not the big memory and gpu advantage is the reason, thanks I needed  a laugh. How can the x1 gpu magically perform as good as the PS4's?? Waiting for that benchmark., It is physically impossible for the x1 to perform at the same level as the ps4, it has weaker hardware period. Anything else you say is FUD.



Around the Network
Jega on 10 March 2014
4k1x3r said:

Guys, why are you even losing your time, for those who might not know this, these are the latest Threads created by our genius Jega.

 

So fair question, why is everyone AGAIN losing time answering him? Because it's what it is, time loss. Flat out time loss.

Whats your point all that means is that I like the Xbox.

All those threads state facts not lies or misinformation.



Jega on 10 March 2014
Max King of the Wild said:
Jega - EVERYONE is laughing at your thread and NO ONE is defending or siding with you. That sshould tell you the thread is full of misinformation and garbage. Please do yourself a favor and request a thread lock and go read the million tech threads on this and other sites that so XB1 is and always will be weaker


There are a few that agree with me 

and once again I agree xbox one has the weaker gpu but has more memory bandwith, GPU speed is not the only benchmark for games.



4k1x3r on 10 March 2014
Jega said:

Whats your point all that means is that I like the Xbox.

All those threads state facts not lies or misinformation.


This is the last drop, this can't be real, you can't be real dude, I refuse to believe it. For your own good, I refuse to believe it.



4k1x3r on 10 March 2014
Jega said:
Max King of the Wild said:
Jega - EVERYONE is laughing at your thread and NO ONE is defending or siding with you. That sshould tell you the thread is full of misinformation and garbage. Please do yourself a favor and request a thread lock and go read the million tech threads on this and other sites that so XB1 is and always will be weaker


There are a few that agree with me 

and once again xbox has the weaker gpu but has more memory bandwith GPU speed is not the only benchmark for games.

Get yourself a sarcasm detector then, dude.



FlamingWeazel on 10 March 2014
Jega said:
Max King of the Wild said:
Jega - EVERYONE is laughing at your thread and NO ONE is defending or siding with you. That sshould tell you the thread is full of misinformation and garbage. Please do yourself a favor and request a thread lock and go read the million tech threads on this and other sites that so XB1 is and always will be weaker


There are a few that agree with me 

and once again xbox has the weaker gpu but has more memory bandwith GPU speed is not the only benchmark for games.

It doesn;t have more memory bandwidth nor will that hel;p as EVERYTHING is rendered at the GPU level period. 32 esram is too tiny. the GPU does ALL graphics processing, no amount of esram can help it LOL.

 

Still waiting for the benchmarks