Jega said:
FlamingWeazel said:
Jega said:
FlamingWeazel said:
Jega said:
Another example put 512MB of ram into the PS4 and see what happens to the graphics. |
LOL how is that the same thing, then the system is ram starved, but both habe 8 gbs of ram. Take out the ps4 gpu , anyone can use hypotheticals...... Amount of ram and ram speed is not the sme thing nor relevant. Yes you need ram, but esram wont make one system with a weaker gpu pefform better it's impossible.
Show me a benchmark of a PC with a 40% better gpu but slower ram where it performed worse in games?
|
The PS4 GPU is said to be 50% faster than the GPU in the Xbox One. You guys really think that difference will actually translate
on your tv.
The PS4 GPU would have to be about 3x more powerful for you to see a difference in performance.
|
LOL we see a diff in perfromance now where have you been? COD ghosts, Tomb raider, BF4, Thief, Watch dogs..........seriously. Most games on PS4 are processing 30-50% more pixels then x1 is. What you said is baloney, even a small GPU upgrade is noticeable, again look at some benchmarks. Why is titanfall only 792 p with Frame rate issues? Why is almost every game not a sports game way lower frame rate and resolution on x 1? It's not sdk and drivers LMAO.
It is lunacy to think 32 MB esram can offset sonys better architetur and 40% GPU compute advantage.,
Waiting or some benchmarks.
|
I already stated that the reason why you are seeing a difference in performance is because Microsoft is late with the
Software developement KIts that will allow developers to run games in 60fps and 1080p.
|
LOL Software not the big memory and gpu advantage is the reason, thanks I needed a laugh. How can the x1 gpu magically perform as good as the PS4's?? Waiting for that benchmark., It is physically impossible for the x1 to perform at the same level as the ps4, it has weaker hardware period. Anything else you say is FUD.
