This is a smaller development studio going up juggernauts games like Halo, Battlefield & Call of duty. The fact that Titan Fall is be compare to these games is living up to the hype. Go play Killzone, COD: Ghost and Titan Fall and tell me which MP experience feel more fresh and new.

Mid 80s seems about right for an online only game with some performance issues.

I'm not sure how many games of the generation have mid 80s averages though so there will probably be at least one disappointed person on here.

Honestly I'm surprised the scores are so low in comparison to the truly unwarranted hype of this game. MS and EA are really pushing hard to outdo Sony/ACTI with this game. However, it is nothing but recycled mechanics, lack luster visuals with better balance of mechanics than the other games it is ripping off. Its still a very vanilla game, maybe french vanilla with just the right amount of sprinkles. The is no reason this game should score so high above COD Ghosts at all except for the hype train just like MW2 which was the worst of the series IMO. However, ACTI and MS did the same thing there for hype that is being done now. The only revolutionary idea was implementing horrible AI bots into a FPS game. That hasn't really been done at this level before. This should be disgraceful to any HxC FPS gamer. Sure killing bots makes you feel like a pro, but causes the competitive side of the game to be completely illegitimate all together. Hence To, the game is an illegitimate competitive FPS and really deserves no better than an 80 score. I mean heck I love the dynasty warriors series, but there is good reason it doesn't normally get high scores as a co-op or SP game. Why does adding that same easy to kill bots in a competitive shooting game cause such an effect that people think its "revolutionary" or "next-gen" by any stretch of the imagination. The only competitive shooter in recent years that was truly close to either of those terms was Dust 514.

Good reviews.

Definitely. After all the downplay and hopes it seems to get quite good reviews.

Damn, I've got to say, after all the hype and treating this game like the second coming, I'm very surprised it didn't hit at least 90. Quite disappointing if I'm being honest, especially with how much MS has riding on this. 

I actually think the people disappointed with this will be the ones that were hyping it up. We all knew the game was going to be reviewed well, but all the hype would have let you to believe it'd have hit at least 90. The fact that it didn't is quite surprising, and probably disappointing to those who actually ate all of MS BS about this being some revolutionary second coming of christ. 

So why wereCOD's the top-selling games on PS3?

Please post where sony said they are never making a MP game again?? There are too many MP shooters already, Sony knows this, destiny will make everyone for get Titanfall.... Sony knows not every game needs shoe horned MP.

Last of US had better MP then any 360 FYI. Battlefield, Planetside, COD, Killzone, destiny, Deep Down, Ff14..already a glut of MP games on PS4...  Just to name a few. There is not shortage of Mp games on ps4, so sony has nothing to worry about.

CoD has an MP mode, with plenty of maps, an SP mode, a third horde style mode, it has splitscreen as well. I'd say that's a lot more value than what Titanfall delivers. To to think they actually want to sell this for 60 bucks, lol. Don't get me wrong, it'll sell, but personally I think I'll wait till it hits 40 or so

I played the beta on origin, it played a lot like COD...mechs were not new and are just a  reskinned vehicle. huge maps vehicles and destruction of BF4 are still more imnpressive then Titanfall imo.