By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - MS leaving the console race would be good for gamers.

Wright said:
only777 said:
Wright said:

I would like to laugh, but that is a very childish response.

 

So I'll just say that I disagree.


So you beleive that studios spending more money needlessly on games and putting un-nessery risks on new IP's is good for the industry.

Please explain.


If you think a monopoly drives up creativitiness and makes people being more risky...

 

...I'm afraid you're wrong.


Your forgetting about Nintendo, Sony would not have a monoply.



Sony want to make money by selling art, Nintendo want to make money by selling fun, Microsoft want to make money.

Around the Network

Not bad. I give this an 8/10

This OP is a joke right?



only777 said:
Wright said:
only777 said:
Wright said:

I would like to laugh, but that is a very childish response.

 

So I'll just say that I disagree.


So you beleive that studios spending more money needlessly on games and putting un-nessery risks on new IP's is good for the industry.

Please explain.


If you think a monopoly drives up creativitiness and makes people being more risky...

 

...I'm afraid you're wrong.


Your forgetting about Nintendo, Sony would not have a monoply.


You said it yourself that Nintendo hasn't had a presence since the N64.



Yes, because monopolies are so good for gamers.

Many seem to be looking back at the PS2 as some sort of halcyon days, but Sony gave us a console with two controller ports, vastly inferior online, no consistent 50/60hz support in Europe, draconian policies on 2D games, and so on.

Similarly at the start of the PS3, they made similar mistakes in that they thought Achievements was an insignificant fad, nobody needs cross-game chat or consistent online, etc.

As mentioned by others, if one competitor left, it would leave a vacuum for someone else (Amazon, Google, Apple, etc.) to step in.



Leadified said:
only777 said:


Your forgetting about Nintendo, Sony would not have a monoply.


You said it yourself that Nintendo hasn't had a presence since the N64.


^ Exactly this. In your situation, you're picturing Nintendo as a non-existant company when it comes to presence. That would also means no one would like to invest on them.



Around the Network

I thought I missed some news, now I leave dissapointed :-/



So it is happening...PS4 preorder.

Greatness Awaits!

Well the same can be said for Sony leaving and MS staying.



"Trick shot? The trick is NOT to get shot." - Lucian

It would be better, I think that with the rise of mobile, console gaming will go downhill. So msft leaving would come at the best time, more for ninty and sony. Of course, msft will increase in price by a large margin if they give tjy xboxup, as tthey're just better at the enterprise side of the company.



I disagree, but respect your opinion.



https://www.trueachievements.com/gamercards/SliferCynDelta.png%5B/IMG%5D">https://www.trueachievements.com/gamer/SliferCynDelta"><img src="https://www.trueachievements.com/gamercards/SliferCynDelta.png

Leadified said:
only777 said:
Wright said:
only777 said:
Wright said:

I would like to laugh, but that is a very childish response.

 

So I'll just say that I disagree.


So you beleive that studios spending more money needlessly on games and putting un-nessery risks on new IP's is good for the industry.

Please explain.


If you think a monopoly drives up creativitiness and makes people being more risky...

 

...I'm afraid you're wrong.


Your forgetting about Nintendo, Sony would not have a monoply.


You said it yourself that Nintendo hasn't had a presence since the N64.


Glad you noticed!

But really, I don't see how having one console affects the studios that make the games.  Remember the PS2 era?  The shear amoutn of greatness that came out of that domination shows that Sony beinging complete control (for the second gen in a row at that point) didn't make a studios that are nothing to do with Sony put out bad PS2 games.

Creative freedom comes from having platform freedom.  Puting restrictions on studios and makiong games multiplat, reduces graphics to the lowest quality so it suits the lower powered machine.

Steam has pretty much the PC digital market to itself, see how bad that's got. No?  That because people can do more because they know all the customers are in one place.



Sony want to make money by selling art, Nintendo want to make money by selling fun, Microsoft want to make money.