I think you need to change the title to: "My opinion about Nintendo"

While I agree with some things, in the end of the day is just your opinion. I, and others, still will buy Nintendo games, that's it

The ones that you are accusing Nintendo of as we speak. I thought it was specific enough given the topic at hand.

As naive and dishonest as the Guinness book. Look at what is said at the end of that section:

"Note that I’m not taking into account tastes when referring all those games earlier (like the Guinness book is not about the best people in the world). I’m just focusing on objective remarkable achievements of some games that could have only been done with effort/time/money. If the game X is beautiful or if the game Y is fun, that is already subjective (about tastes)"

I read a lot of negatives. Surely Nintendo has some positives as a company?

Ah, ok, now I got you. You are criticizing the fact that I'm implicitly saying that Nintendo is worse than Sony / Microsoft because of all the negative points I've mentioned in the OP. Well, that's not necessarily the case but if you could make a bigger/worst list of negative points about Sony or Microsoft, I would be very surprised.

I'm not going to try nearly as hard as you did. I don't really care that much about showing you up.

See Above

I came up with arguments and I've backed up them with facts. If you don't like the truth, that's not my fault. You prefer to tell they're empty without explaining how. That's a way to avoid debate and that's fine by me. I just wonder what you're doing in a forum.

Regarding Wii Sports and Killzone, I have no doubt about that. Like there are who prefers Killzone over Wii Sports. That's subjective, about tastes. But look at what the OP says:

"Note that I’m not taking into account tastes when referring all those games earlier (like the Guinness book is not about the best people in the world). I’m just focusing on objective remarkable achievements of some games that could have only been done with effort/time/money. If the game X is beautiful or if the game Y is fun, that is already subjective (about tastes)"

IMO it could be argued the reason so much of Nintendo s "blue Ocean" evaporated so quickly was the shovelware-   most experienced gamers knew/learned to avoid the shovelware- but the new casual gamer came in and bought a ton of shovelware- they eventiually relaized it for what it was but in many of the big casual genre s like hunting, fishing etc virtually all the games were shovelware- so the entertainment was short term, skin deep and a cheap thrll- not enough to get most of the "blue ocean" to keep gaming, to respect gaming and def not enough for them to go buy a $350 Wii U that was completely different "in their eyes" than the intuitive Wii. 

I probably represent oe of the minority who became interested in what the Wii had to offer via playing games w my Son-  but instead of giving up on gaming, I waded through, educated myself to help avoid buying my son poor value games/shovelware as well as myself

If all I had ever played was the shovelware games i would have left gaming behind several years ago and not been willing to invest in nearly as many games for my children-   

Although i've enjoyed all the Crush 40 Sega's given me over the years (seriously, i did. The Sonic Adventure 2 soundtrack is kickass), one has to admit that when Nintendo finally moved to full instrumental from MIDI in Super Mario Galaxy, that was a moment to behold.