By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - AE Games speaks out on the WiiU and other 3rd Parties

Mnementh on 11 February 2014
Xen said:

Perhaps more of an assurance that it is a joke, the fact that you saw that is just someone paying for privacy, I.E not showing the actual registrar in the whois...

But you never know... would be awesome if their game was a 2D sidescroller in which you take down corporate types...

Let's see. If this is a joke (what I assume at the mnoment), they will reveal that on Friday. Otherwise we see an actual game.



3DS-FC: 4511-1768-7903 (Mii-Name: Mnementh), Nintendo-Network-ID: Mnementh, Switch: SW-7706-3819-9381 (Mnementh)

my greatest games: 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024

10 years greatest game event!

bets: [GTA6]

Around the Network
curl-6 on 11 February 2014
vivster said:
curl-6 said:
vivster said:
It's so easy for a small developer that only develops for one platform to leash out against bigger companies that develop for multple platforms.

The big devs make it easy with their piss poor behaviour.

As long as big Developers/Publisher make more money they don't have to take shit from anyone.

I'm not saying people shouldn't judge them but that it is quite laughable to criticize someone who is obviously more successful than you in what they are doing.

I don't see how it's laughable to point out corporations mistreating their audience.



vivster on 11 February 2014
curl-6 said:
vivster said:
curl-6 said:
vivster said:
It's so easy for a small developer that only develops for one platform to leash out against bigger companies that develop for multple platforms.

The big devs make it easy with their piss poor behaviour.

As long as big Developers/Publisher make more money they don't have to take shit from anyone.

I'm not saying people shouldn't judge them but that it is quite laughable to criticize someone who is obviously more successful than you in what they are doing.

I don't see how it's laughable to point out corporations mistreating their audience.

I don't see how a company can mistreat their audience with things that either don't exist or are free to purchase.

Is Microsoft mistreating me because I don't like the games on the Xbox? Is Sony mistreating me because Infamous doesn't release a month earlier? Is Square Enix mistreating me because LR could be the first shitty FF for me?



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

VitroBahllee on 11 February 2014

They sound like High Voltage praising themselves before launching the Conduit. This time, two things are different for me: I have an actually current-powered current-gen console in addition to the Nintendo system, and I know not to give any credit to this kind of horn-blowing.



curl-6 on 11 February 2014
vivster said:

I don't see how a company can mistreat their audience with things that either don't exist or are free to purchase.

Is Microsoft mistreating me because I don't like the games on the Xbox? Is Sony mistreating me because Infamous doesn't release a month earlier? Is Square Enix mistreating me because LR could be the first shitty FF for me?

They can mistreat theiryour audience by giving them shoddy and/or late ports.



Around the Network
vivster on 11 February 2014
curl-6 said:
vivster said:

I don't see how a company can mistreat their audience with things that either don't exist or are free to purchase.

Is Microsoft mistreating me because I don't like the games on the Xbox? Is Sony mistreating me because Infamous doesn't release a month earlier? Is Square Enix mistreating me because LR could be the first shitty FF for me?

They can mistreat theiryour audience by giving them shoddy and/or late ports.

Not if it is the audience that chooses to play the bad ports even though there are superior versions out there. You can't blame the company for the bad decisions its audience makes with their products.

Don't buy it if it is bad. That's the win-win for both company and audience because first will learn from it and the latter will not have to play rubbish.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

vkaraujo on 11 February 2014
vivster said:

As long as big Developers/Publisher make more money they don't have to take shit from anyone.

I'm not saying people shouldn't judge them but that it is quite laughable to criticize someone who is obviously more successful than you in what they are doing.


Wtf? We can't criticize people just because they made money? 

So rock bands can't say a thing about, let's say, justin bieber, just because he makes more money?

CoD:ghosts is outselling TLoU 4:1, even on PS3 it is 2:1. Should we just take all Goty from TLoU and give to activision? CoD is obviously "more successful".

 

F*** that, that makes no sense



curl-6 on 11 February 2014
vivster said:
curl-6 said:
vivster said:

I don't see how a company can mistreat their audience with things that either don't exist or are free to purchase.

Is Microsoft mistreating me because I don't like the games on the Xbox? Is Sony mistreating me because Infamous doesn't release a month earlier? Is Square Enix mistreating me because LR could be the first shitty FF for me?

They can mistreat theiryour audience by giving them shoddy and/or late ports.

Not if it is the audience that chooses to play the bad ports even though there are superior versions out there. You can't blame the company for the bad decisions its audience makes with their products.

Don't buy it if it is bad. That's the win-win for both company and audience because first will learn from it and the latter will not have to play rubbish.

They shouldn't make bad ports in the first place. That's disrespectful to the consumer.



vkaraujo on 11 February 2014
vivster said:

Not if it is the audience that chooses to play the bad ports even though there are superior versions out there. You can't blame the company for the bad decisions its audience makes with their products.

Don't buy it if it is bad. That's the win-win for both company and audience because first will learn from it and the latter will not have to play rubbish.


But nintendofans are not buying the bad ports, and are being blamed for that...



vivster on 11 February 2014
vkaraujo said:
vivster said:

Not if it is the audience that chooses to play the bad ports even though there are superior versions out there. You can't blame the company for the bad decisions its audience makes with their products.

Don't buy it if it is bad. That's the win-win for both company and audience because first will learn from it and the latter will not have to play rubbish.


But nintendofans are not buying the bad ports, and are being blamed for that...

Well they technically don't blame them but they do see consequences by the low sales. It's a vicious circle and both parties are to blame. In the end it only damages the companies and companies are usually sore losers that's why they pretend to blame the consumer when it is really their fault.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.