By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - The Order 1886 will run at 1080p@30fps

Tagged games:

DerNebel on 05 February 2014
X1Gates said:
ethomaz said:

Was it confirmed the lack of MP?


They don't have to confirm it we all know there is no competitive multiplayer, this is sony we are talking about a company that cannot develop a good multiplayer game. Nearly all their games are story driven, this was the game that looked so promising and with competitive multiplayer it could have been different. But now it looks like just another naughty dog clone, stoy driven and it's getting tyring.

 

ps there was a interview with the owner not so long ago stating they were "open" to a multiplayer but focused on single player, make of it wha you want.

So basically, there is no confirmation at all that there won't be any multiplayer (which btw would be not be bad) and you're just talkin' out of your ass. Also, you do realize that the last 3 ND games had multiplayer, right?

Thanks for that



Around the Network
jacks81x on 05 February 2014
X1Gates said:
ethomaz said:

X1Gates said:

We are talking about this game which is some how being compared to Gears. This game is nothing like gears apart from being a TPS no other similarities. These guys couldn't even develop a multiplayer for this game and everyone is shouting they are the next naughtdog. Sony needs a good multiplayer development team and not a naughty dog, so far all their games are story driven, getting repetitive and frankly boring.

Was it confirmed the lack of MP?


They don't have to confirm it we all know there is no competitive multiplayer, this is sony we are talking about a company that cannot develop a good multiplayer game. Nearly all their games are story driven, this was the game that looked so promising and with competitive multiplayer it could have been different. But now it looks like just another naughty dog clone, stoy driven and it's getting tyring.

 

ps there was a interview with the owner not so long ago stating they were "open" to a multiplayer but focused on single player, make of it wha you want.

DCUO?  Planetside 2?  Everquest Next?  Sony has an entire division dedicated to creating online games.

Also, I thought TLOU's MP was brilliant and a breath of fresh air.



deskpro2k3 on 05 February 2014

 I want good story driven content that is worth 60 dollars, multiplayer can come second.



CPU: Ryzen 7950X
GPU: MSI 4090 SUPRIM X 24G
Motherboard: MSI MEG X670E GODLIKE
RAM: CORSAIR DOMINATOR PLATINUM 32GB DDR5
SSD: Kingston FURY Renegade 4TB
Gaming Console: PLAYSTATION 5
drkohler on 05 February 2014
X1Gates said:
ethomaz said:
X1Gates said:
This game also has no multiplayer and yet some are comparing it with Gears which is far from it. Gears is GEARS because of the multiplayer and not story. Sony studios only know how to produce single players and totally suck at multiplayer.

No multiplayer? It was inFAMOUS.

We are talking about this game which is some how being compared to Gears. This game is nothing like gears apart from being a TPS no other similarities. These guys couldn't even develop a multiplayer for this game and everyone is shouting they are the next naughtdog. Sony needs a good multiplayer development team and not a naughty dog, so far all their games are story driven, getting repetitive and frankly boring.

You should try just a little harder for the achievment: "Banned after only three posts"



KBG29 on 05 February 2014
X1Gates said:
ethomaz said:

X1Gates said:

We are talking about this game which is some how being compared to Gears. This game is nothing like gears apart from being a TPS no other similarities. These guys couldn't even develop a multiplayer for this game and everyone is shouting they are the next naughtdog. Sony needs a good multiplayer development team and not a naughty dog, so far all their games are story driven, getting repetitive and frankly boring.

Was it confirmed the lack of MP?


They don't have to confirm it we all know there is no competitive multiplayer, this is sony we are talking about a company that cannot develop a good multiplayer game. Nearly all their games are story driven, this was the game that looked so promising and with competitive multiplayer it could have been different. But now it looks like just another naughty dog clone, stoy driven and it's getting tyring.

 

ps there was a interview with the owner not so long ago stating they were "open" to a multiplayer but focused on single player, make of it wha you want.

I guess I will never understand what people are looking for in multiplayer. Sony put in a massive effort on PS3 and had some great multiplayer games, but no one wanted them. Warhawk, and MAG were the best multiplayer games of last gen in my opinion, but they never got any love, because people just went back to the same boring COD/BF.

OT: I always expected the single player portions of WWS games to run at 1080p/30fps. Sony always trys to push the boundries, and I think even with an i7/Titan in PS4 the results would have been the same. As long as they continue the KZSF aproach and aim for locked 60fps in multiplayer, I have no issues.



Stop hate, let others live the life they were given. Everyone has their problems, and no one should have to feel ashamed for the way they were born. Be proud of who you are, encourage others to be proud of themselves. Learn, research, absorb everything around you. Nothing is meaningless, a purpose is placed on everything no matter how you perceive it. Discover how to love, and share that love with everything that you encounter. Help make existence a beautiful thing.

Kevyn B Grams
10/03/2010 

KBG29 on PSN&XBL

Around the Network
DeadBigfoot21 on 05 February 2014
pezus said:
DeadBigfoot21 said:
Well some people will either not be happy or will say "graphics dont matter"

Why? The devs are saying they don't want to sacrifice the graphics for framerate...

Because "the other side" always talk about power and how much powerful it is over the competition. 

So 1080p @ 30fps is kinda weak from a machine that is "So much more powerful" 

It should do 1080p @ 60fps with no problem. 



BMaker11 on 05 February 2014
X1Gates said:
ethomaz said:

X1Gates said:

We are talking about this game which is some how being compared to Gears. This game is nothing like gears apart from being a TPS no other similarities. These guys couldn't even develop a multiplayer for this game and everyone is shouting they are the next naughtdog. Sony needs a good multiplayer development team and not a naughty dog, so far all their games are story driven, getting repetitive and frankly boring.

Was it confirmed the lack of MP?


They don't have to confirm it we all know there is no competitive multiplayer, this is sony we are talking about a company that cannot develop a good multiplayer game. Nearly all their games are story driven, this was the game that looked so promising and with competitive multiplayer it could have been different. But now it looks like just another naughty dog clone, stoy driven and it's getting tyring.

 

ps there was a interview with the owner not so long ago stating they were "open" to a multiplayer but focused on single player, make of it wha you want.

LOL, Uncharted 2/3/Last of Us, LBP1/2/Karting, KZ2/3, Resistance 1/2/3, GT5/6, Demon's Souls (published), Dust 514....I could keep going if you want me to



trixiemafia86 on 05 February 2014
DeadBigfoot21 said:

Because "the other side" always talk about power and how much powerful it is over the competition. 

So 1080p @ 30fps is kinda weak from a machine that is "So much more powerful" 

It should do 1080p @ 60fps with no problem. 

Even if a GTX Titan Black edition was in the PS4. The developer would rather chose graphics at 4K (lol) over 60 fps. This is not a multiplayer focused/racing/fighting game.



Smartest nam evila

Current Platforms: HighendPC[rip]/PS4/PS3[rip]/Vita[rip]

X1Gates on 05 February 2014
drkohler said:
X1Gates said:
ethomaz said:
X1Gates said:
This game also has no multiplayer and yet some are comparing it with Gears which is far from it. Gears is GEARS because of the multiplayer and not story. Sony studios only know how to produce single players and totally suck at multiplayer.

No multiplayer? It was inFAMOUS.

We are talking about this game which is some how being compared to Gears. This game is nothing like gears apart from being a TPS no other similarities. These guys couldn't even develop a multiplayer for this game and everyone is shouting they are the next naughtdog. Sony needs a good multiplayer development team and not a naughty dog, so far all their games are story driven, getting repetitive and frankly boring.

You should try just a little harder for the achievment: "Banned after only three posts"

Banned for what? As a person who owns a ps3/ps4, who bought the ps3 when it was priced at £425 with only resistance on offer, I can't express my views? That I am oversaturated on story driven games. Oh apparently as soon as you speak of sony's short comings, their lack of willingness to money hat games etc you suddenly become a "troll". Whatever dude, go do one.



Gehirnkrampf on 05 February 2014

play3.de is a site full of shit.
the comments are full of trolls and the articles there a shitty.

that's the reason for me to be there too :D



must-have-list for platforms i don't own yet:

WiiU: Donkey Kong

XBone: Dead Rising 3, Ryse