well i guess its not unique now as its a sequel....
however infamous 1 was pretty unique when it first released.

back ontop. The game looks better and better everytime i see it!

i dont like to take console sides and i know this is trolling but i think Titan fall is visually boring and dull like every other shooter. IMO it looks fun but nothing special in my books.

I look at Infamous as the first game to come out for the new consoles that is only possible with the new consoles. Everything else is on PS360 and just a slightly better looking game. Exception being Battlefield 4 as 64 player matches weren't possible on PS360.

The game looks amazing, both graphically and gameplay wise. It isn't just another game in a genre that is played out. Or a franchise that should have ended but is being milked to death. Or a clone of a game hoping to profit from someone else success.

There aren't many actual true next gen games coming out between Infamous and The Order. Hopefully this game will not suck lol

quoted for the fucking truth!

THIS

i hate the enemies we have seen so far.
and they have to give me a compensation for not being able to slide on supply lines and rails anymore.

I don told that Prototype was released first.
Why i cant say it looks like Prototype?
Because Infamous was released first?
Ok then i say Prototype looks like Infamous which includes that Infamous looks like Prototype.
Are you happy now?
If you take a look at the games from a neutral position it could be one game with 2 characters for choice with different powers.
They are looking same if you say Prototype looks like Infamous or Infamous looks like Prototype.
Gameplay is the same.
Thats why there is no gameplay comparison in the Video there is no need.
The gameplay is boring for me.
If its nice for you its ok but dont shit on me if i compare this extremly same looking games and say i want downplay Infamous with this comparison.
If this is a downplay for you then take a real look at Infamous.
I cant see the gem sorry.
Have fun with that game.

question mark has spoken.

As much as it's semantical or a nuance, to say "Infamous looks like Prototype" makes it seem like Prototype is the originator, and it isn't. You can't switch it back and forth and then say they are the same. It's like saying Dante's Inferno looks like God of War. No. God of War did it before Dante's and God of War did it better than Dante's. Just like with Infamous and Prototype.

It doesn't do a game justice to say that it "looks like" a copy cat that came out after it. And then for your to invalidate the game by saying it looks like the phony....ok. Don't play Halo because it looks like Tribes. Or how about another analogy. Twist Up tastes like crap, so Sprite must taste like crap as well because they're "similar". Or, I played a Chintendo Vii (yes, that's a thing) and I didn't like it. The Nintendo Wii is "similar" or "the same" to that, so I probably won't like that either. See where this is going, where you say the original must not be good because you didn't like the lesser copycat?

Nah not a down play at all....just your opinion and that is fine. Me personally after playing both I feel they are two VERY different games(as do most people who have actually played both games). But for you that's not the case and there is nothing wrong with that. Good day O mysterious one!