| ?????????? said: I don told that Prototype was released first. |
As much as it's semantical or a nuance, to say "Infamous looks like Prototype" makes it seem like Prototype is the originator, and it isn't. You can't switch it back and forth and then say they are the same. It's like saying Dante's Inferno looks like God of War. No. God of War did it before Dante's and God of War did it better than Dante's. Just like with Infamous and Prototype.
It doesn't do a game justice to say that it "looks like" a copy cat that came out after it. And then for your to invalidate the game by saying it looks like the phony....ok. Don't play Halo because it looks like Tribes. Or how about another analogy. Twist Up tastes like crap, so Sprite must taste like crap as well because they're "similar". Or, I played a Chintendo Vii (yes, that's a thing) and I didn't like it. The Nintendo Wii is "similar" or "the same" to that, so I probably won't like that either. See where this is going, where you say the original must not be good because you didn't like the lesser copycat?








