Wow at the spin both sides are pushing in this thread. Truly astonishing.

I mean this article is in no way controversial yet here we are arguing over what exactly.

Both versions seems to perform inline with their PC counterparts. PS4 does particularly well in matching the 7870. Where the X1 performs slightly better than a 7770.

Thats inline with the expected performance difference given the differences at a hardware level for the GPU's. I would say the PS4 version seems to perform slightly better than expected as it matches the 7870.

Its also interesting to see that the memory architecture differences doesnt seem to make much difference...the gulf in performance can be fully explained by the difference in gpu compute performance.

Another thing we dont really know is what level is this version running at. Watching the gameplay it looks pretty close to Ultra on PC imo. Thats quite an accomplishment i would say given the generally underpowered hardware.

Edit: The X1 version is locked at 30 so its not a fair comparison. However they wouldnt lock the game to 30 if the FPS was consistantly much higher. The x1 version looks pretty smooth as well so X1 owners should still go out and buy it looks waaaay better than the last gen version. PS4 sticks between 40 - 50 FPS most of the time so i think not locking to 30 was a good move.

Ports were handled by two different companies neither of which were Crystal Dynamics. It makes sense from a technical point of view to have the Xbone version capped at 30fps for 1080p games. If the developer decided to go with 720p then yeah it could have had an unlocked frame rate like the PS4 version for a perceptual 60fps experiance.

I'm glad to see this gen so far screen tear seems to be a thing of the past or at least there's hardly any noticeable tearing.

oh i c. no wonder a 7870 is outperforming a gtx 680

Yep, 24 lowest ;)

This guy is un fucking believable

this post has been moderated by axumblade

Of course you see judder in PS4... the YouTube video runs at 30fps lol... 60fps capture converted to 30fps video generates a lot of judders.

In fact they said thera a dip to 18fps in the video but the graph is showing wrong because of the update cycle... they will fix that for the final Face-Off.

[Update 20:20 GMT: and as the more eagle-eyed have noticed, we also have a registered dip to 18fps, where the game seems to momentarily freeze for 12 frames at 4:12 in the video - though this isn't indicative of general performance. For those interested, this post explains the confusion - in effect, the frame-rate counter is updating every half second - as you can see, the graph itself is registering 24fps. Apologies for the confusion, We'll get this fixed up in time for the full Face-Off.] 

So lowest 18. 

I think that you are understanding it wrong. Read the B3D post: A trailing average calculated from x refresh samples (at say 60hz) can make variation between 20 and 30 hz look like less than 20. It all depends on when you start and end the period you use to calculate the figure.

I think they will try to fix to the full face-off... and if the game freeze 12 frames in one second for a 30fps game then it have only 18 frames in that second... so 18fps.

lol. thx