So I have to put it very simply to you like a child:

its not Nintendo responsibility to help the 3rd party's. its really that simple

What did I do? I bought my third party ports and exclusives for the 3DS and Wii U, I got some 3rd party eShop exclusives, I even chose ZombiU over Mario at launch because I wanted to support 3rd parties.

what features were they missing? and no DLC is NOT a feature. and Ghosts was cheapest on Wii U. So those are your two right there, try to debunk those first.

oh please you sound like a child. If the games or so "medium" why even complain when you dont get them? Maybe they are not medium and you are just throwing a hissy fit. Either the games are not up to your great standards which wouldnt matter if they make it to Wii U anyway or you or lying to yourself and you do want them and thats why you are complaining. Pick one.

DLC is definitely a feature, particularly for multiplayer focused games like CoD, where additional maps are released, with maps being central to the multiplayer experience. Why buy a game on the WiiU when it's not going to get ongoing support on other platforms? I believe online clans were also missing. Ghosts also suffers from Black Ops 2's smaller multiplayer user base.

If DLC wasn't a feature, why would Sony bother with exclusive DLC content?

Try again, where did you read that I was complaining about not getting these mediocre games, I have a PS3 & haven't bought these mediocre games on that platform either... I bought the PS3 for the only few good games that were released on it like GT5/6, Ni No Kuni, Journey, Soul Calibur(despite going stale since the 2nd), Rayman is great but I have the better version on the Wii U. Every generation is the same, Nintendo consoles have less games, but the top 20 games are better than the sea of mediocre games that are released on the other platforms, here & there appear half a dozen of truly great games on the other platforms that I happily enjoy but that's all..., there are more fantastic games on the SNES than on the PS2, PS3, PS4, XBox, XBox360, XBoxOne together, that speaks a lot, the PS1 had quite a few fantastic games too, but from there it's been going downhill, with only Nintendo maintaining high standarts and truly innovating. For "mature" "hardcore" games I have my PC, to play all the generic shooters (BF3 is great despite cheaters & the pseudo aces mistaking it for flight simulator, BF4 sucks, COD used to be good, Crysis as pretty as shallow & CS is CS) since playing shooting games with a gamepad on a console has failed "hardlycore" written all over... great racing sims are the other games played on my PC. I would gladly play them on my Wii U, but I'm realistic, for Nintendo to have the kind of raw power my PC has, it would mean a financial & managment suicide as they would have to sell a 1000$ console to match the graphics & physics of the games I play. That's not what I want from Nintendo, I want the great games they keep on making, so all is well, if 3rd Party want to make me buy their games, do as Nintendo(es) and make great games, not the uninspired shalowness I see. Life too short to play half baked games... & I don't like being a paying beta tester... so...

To end, what I'm complaining is the bull given to Nintendo by (in no particualr order):

Pseudo-gamers who were using diapers when I was already playing the original Tetris, always badmouthing Nintendo because it hurts in their manhood.

Pseudo-journalists who are in reality paid brand integrists nerds, publicity poorly disguised if you want, firing on the one not giving a buck, paid by the ones giving a buck to do so.

Game makers, that are also paid to make this or that game for that platform & try to justify it by spitting on the others because, I mean man, they are so godly & reality only exists because they want so all they say must be true & they r so cool & awsome (not looking @ u Kojima... no, not @ all).

Sorry I find Nintendo games the real mature ones, because they don't pretend to be other things than games & that you have to be trully adult about it when you are not a kid anymore, that is despite being grown up, enjoying games like a kid is not diminishing & it doesn't affect your manhood if it has shells & stars over laser guns, blood & boobs. Using foul language can only go so far as a mean to affirm yourself out of childhood into adulthood. But for most gaming companies I understand it's better keeping gamers in Nerdteenland, where shallow propaganda maintains the everpaying sheep in the herd. Go eat you "New" IP of same old gameplay with shinier graphics while I play fresh, innovative, masterfull & unmatched gameplay in Mario, Zelda "rehashes"...

so...why are you in this thread complaining again?

Try again, where did you read that I was complaining about not getting these mediocre games, I have a PS3 & haven't bought these mediocre games on that platform either... I bought the PS3 for the only few good games that were released on it like GT5/6, Ni No Kuni, Journey, Soul Calibur(despite going stale since the 2nd), Rayman is great but I have the better version on the Wii U. Every generation is the same, Nintendo consoles have less games, but the top 20 games are better than the sea of mediocre games that are released on the other platforms, here & there appear half a dozen of truly great games on the other platforms that I happily enjoy but that's all..., there are more fantastic games on the SNES than on the PS2, PS3, PS4, XBox, XBox360, XBoxOne together, that speaks a lot (1), the PS1 had quite a few fantastic games too, but from there it's been going downhill, with only Nintendo maintaining high standarts and truly innovating (2). For "mature" "hardcore" games I have my PC, to play all the generic shooters (BF3 is great despite cheaters & the pseudo aces mistaking it for flight simulator, BF4 sucks, COD used to be good, Crysis as pretty as shallow & CS is CS) since playing shooting games with a gamepad on a console has failed "hardlycore" written all over... great racing sims are the other games played on my PC. I would gladly play them on my Wii U, but I'm realistic, for Nintendo to have the kind of raw power my PC has, it would mean a financial & managment suicide as they would have to sell a 1000$ console to match the graphics & physics of the games I play. That's not what I want from Nintendo, I want the great games they keep on making, so all is well, if 3rd Party want to make me buy their games, do as Nintendo(es) and make great games, not the uninspired shalowness I see. Life too short to play half baked games... & I don't like being a paying beta tester... so...

To end, what I'm complaining is the bull given to Nintendo by (in no particualr order):

Pseudo-gamers who were using diapers when I was already playing the original Tetris, always badmouthing Nintendo because it hurts in their manhood.(3)

Pseudo-journalists who are in reality paid brand integrists nerds, publicity poorly disguised if you want, firing on the one not giving a buck, paid by the ones giving a buck to do so.(4)

Game makers, that are also paid to make this or that game for that platform & try to justify it by spitting on the others because, I mean man, they are so godly & reality only exists because they want so all they say must be true & they r so cool & awsome (not looking @ u Kojima... no, not @ all).

Sorry I find Nintendo games the real mature ones, because they don't pretend to be other things than games & that you have to be trully adult about it when you are not a kid anymore, that is despite being grown up, enjoying games like a kid is not diminishing & it doesn't affect your manhood if it has shells & stars over laser guns, blood & boobs.(5) Using foul language can only go so far as a mean to affirm yourself out of childhood into adulthood. But for most gaming companies I understand it's better keeping gamers in Nerdteenland, where shallow propaganda maintains the everpaying sheep in the herd. Go eat you "New" IP of same old gameplay with shinier graphics while I play fresh, innovative, masterfull & unmatched gameplay in Mario, Zelda "rehashes"...(6)