Quality is subjective. Call of Duty has a very high quality because people want to buy it and enjoy the game. Having high sales means developers will take more time and money to create add-ons and sequals as well. What seems high quality to you may not be high quality to everyone else. Uncharted might seem dull and boring to Call of Duty players.

If you add up the utility from higher selling games and multiply it by the amount the game sold you would find that people earn more satisfaction from the highest selling games rather than the lowest selling games. Most of you will derail my thread because you're not educated. That is how I determine quality. If you don't know what I am talking about look here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utility

No sales = No game = 0 quality = DOOM

Some sales = cheaply made game = some quality

High sales = high budget game = High quality

Sales is correlation with Quality

If a crappy Gears of War/God of War came out (like they did in 2013), they will recieve less sales (which was true).

Sorry guys!!

The DOOMAGE is everywhere.

"Sales = Quality"

No, sorry

"No Sales = Doom"

Sure

Tearaway must be such a terrible game then...

Didn't sean also say that SALES = QULITY ? -_-

So, what your saying is that Cod games are higher in quality than games like Super Mario 3d Word, Last of Us and Bioshock Infinite? Okay there...

They sure are to me that is. 

How could uncharted be boring or dull to CoD fans? They are both huge on big set pieces and all out mayhem.

Yes, he remindes everyone that's the case in every one of his articles. But it is kind of flawed to think that way, Super Mario 3D World is a really good game, I would even consider it of high quality! Low sales could mean that a product didn't match consumer expectations, therefore it's sales are low.

doom did sell pretty well actually and the quality was insane