By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - Drone strike on wedding party in Yemen kills at least 13 civilians

Oh I see, I guess I missed a page but can't really remember a case where a policehelicopter shot down some innocents though..



Around the Network
GamechaserBE said:
Oh I see, I guess I missed a page but can't really remember a case where a policehelicopter shot down some innocents though..


The US government has shot lots of people down from helicopters before.

It's actually a lot easier then from drones.

 

Police Helicopter?  No, but then again we'd be talking about Police drones afterall.

Most drones don't actually have weapons... I mean.  They're just remote controlled airplanes more or less.  The average drone could be made with technology you can buy from you local mall kiosk.  The expensive/complicated part is all in the infrastructure that makes it so that you don't need a pilot on hand.

 

Well I take that police helicopter thing back, American Police helicopers.  I've seen videos of other cops shooting down people from their helicopters.



Geeeaaaoooow Murika!



I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.

Also, traces of demolition explosives found on the debris of both towers:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/traces-of-explosives-in-9-11-dust-scientists-say

This was also found on another building, WTC-7, which also "collapsed" in a perfect demolition, but no plane impact this time.

I guess this building thought it was a game and collapsed itself just to be on the mainstream x)



FrancisNobleman said:
Also, traces of demolition explosives found on the debris of both towers:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/traces-of-explosives-in-9-11-dust-scientists-say

This was also found on another building, WTC-7, which also "collapsed" in a perfect demolition, but no plane impact this time.

I guess this building thought it was a game and collapsed itself just to be on the mainstream x)

nooooope.

Covered in the above website....

 

and... noooo again.  covered on the website.

 

Your arguements aren't just invalid, but even outdated as far as crackpot theories goes.



Around the Network
Talal said:
And I haven't heard anything about this in the news.

Lol, go figure ;)



Kasz216 said:
FrancisNobleman said:
Also, traces of demolition explosives found on the debris of both towers:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/traces-of-explosives-in-9-11-dust-scientists-say

This was also found on another building, WTC-7, which also "collapsed" in a perfect demolition, but no plane impact this time.

I guess this building thought it was a game and collapsed itself just to be on the mainstream x)

nooooope.

Covered in the above website....

 

and... noooo again.  covered on the website.

 

Your arguements aren't just invalid, but even outdated as far as crackpot theories goes.

That website isn't just invalid, but even outdated as far as crackpot blind murican theories go.

And the fact they say "America" when they want to say "USA" doesn't bode well for their credibility. 



FrancisNobleman said:
Kasz216 said:

nooooope.

Covered in the above website....

 

and... noooo again.  covered on the website.

 

Your arguements aren't just invalid, but even outdated as far as crackpot theories goes.

That website isn't just invalid, but even outdated as far as crackpot blind murican theories go.

And the fact they say "America" when they want to say "USA" doesn't bode well for their credibility. 


Er, no.  It's got direct proof on it, for why the stuff you mentioned wasn't true.

Just like all the other theories you've posted, i'ved disproven, that you've had no counter arguements against.


Which is always the funny game about you conspiracy theory guys.  You come up with a dozen theories, that all get shot down, then you make up a dozen more... that all get shot down.

Just relying on the fact that eventually someone gets so tired of listening to made up bullshit they shut down their mind and finally stop researching the stuff.

The problem is... being over 10 years old...

everyones already been over and debunked every single 9/11 was an inside job myth a few times over. 


Since it was a single event, caught on camera, as far as conspiracy theories go, at this point it's behind stuff like The holocaust never existed,  all relgiions were created by the same global conspriacy,  Jewish bankers control the world and the moon landing was faked.

It's more credible to believe in the invisible flying spaghetti monster than 9/11 being an inside job at this point.

 

 

Additionally, America is totally the correct name.  The USA's full name is the "United States of America."

United States is a Descriptor.

 

Nobody called the Republic of Congo or the Democratic Republic of Congo,   the Republic, or the Democratic Republic.

 

Anger of America using the term America mostly just stems from people being taught shitty Geography.    That teaches a combined American continent.   Which is a model rejected by ever major geographic and geologic scientific society.



The Americas, or America, also known as the New World, are the combined continental landmasses of North America and South America, in the Western Hemisphere. Along with their associated islands, they cover 8.3% of the Earth's total surface area


This is geography from like, 5 centuries ago, and is still valid. If you want to refer to USA, you say USA or US.



FrancisNobleman said:
The Americas, or America, also known as the New World, are the combined continental landmasses of North America and South America, in the Western Hemisphere. Along with their associated islands, they cover 8.3% of the Earth's total surface area


This is geography from like, 5 centuries ago, and is still valid. If you want to refer to USA, you say USA or US.

Er... no.

You clearly didn't read the rest of the Wikipedia article you quoted that from.

 

Note also... Americas.

 

Another wikipedia artilcle that might enlighten you....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continent

 

Then again, actual lisitng of facts hasn't changed your opinion yet.  Despite you having no actual counters to the evidence presented against your misinformation.