By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - Drone strike on wedding party in Yemen kills at least 13 civilians

bobfulci said:
Kasz216 said:
FrancisNobleman said:
curl-6 said:

Of course not, but when you fly planes into buildings, they collapse. This "inside job" nonsense is as silly as "aliens built the pyramids".


Buildings are prepared to witstand such colisions. Even if it was to collapse due to that, it wouldn't certainly happen in a perfectly vertical professional demolition. And that happened not to just one, but two towers. And there's footage of bombs exploding from bottom to top to achieve this.

How do you explain it ? Fuel exploding in a timely syncronized manner ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pjmktbt-F_Q

 

Aeroplanes my ass, I'm not dumb thank you. I can clearly see what's in front of my fucking face. Now notice that I'm not blaming the US for an inside job, I'm just blaming them for saying it was the plane impacts. Many engineers and physicists and still in shock how could the government brianwash people into buying that.


http://conspiracies.skepticproject.com/articles/911/twin-towers/page/4/#freefall

Seriously dude... read the website...

realize how dumb your opinion is.

They'll have something for pretty much every single wrong opinion someone fed you to sell their books to prey on peoples paranoia.

OK, the website you provided seems to be an anonymous group of people who have an opinion. Whether that opinion actually makes sense is another question and just proves ot me that the skeptics are just as easily led as the people they claim to be "conspiracy theorist nutjobs." The bottom line is this, either you believe the official story 100% or you don't. I myself do not have a degree inb engineering so if what they claim is FACT, I would have no real way of making that determination. My belief is based soley on facts that make sense to me and a huge number of eyewitness testimony as well as major inconsistencies with the official account that cannot be easily dismissed (i.e. the jet engine at the pentagon not matching the jet that crashed into the building) and would be worthy of another look at the very least. Combine this with the fact that over 1400 demolitions experts and engineers are openly questioning the official story themselves and you have something worth looking at.

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_george_w_071221_top_scientists_and_s.htm

Except... no.  No they don't.


For example, the first person the article mentions?   Dr. Lynn Margulis?

Dr. of BIOLOGY.

Who beleives AID's doesn't exist.

So.... she's not even a good Biologist.

The fact that they're leading with her... should tell you something.

 

Outside which... the skeptics project doesn't actually just post opinions... but actual videos you can look at that specifically prove the crackpot theroeis as...

 

well crackpot theories.  It should be pretty obvious they're crackpot theories to anybody willing to look at the whole thing with anything close to resembling a critical logical eye.

Outside that.... the quotes from actual experts... have pretty much all been snippets taken out of context.



Around the Network
tuscaniman99 said:
Yeah that is sad. Now compare it to the the thousands upon thousands of innnocents that terrorists have blown up.


Absolutely embarrassing comment you've made there. You are actually excusing this?

You can't compare murders.



And I haven't heard anything about this in the news.



Kasz216 said:
FrancisNobleman said:
curl-6 said:

Of course not, but when you fly planes into buildings, they collapse. This "inside job" nonsense is as silly as "aliens built the pyramids".


Buildings are prepared to witstand such colisions. Even if it was to collapse due to that, it wouldn't certainly happen in a perfectly vertical professional demolition. And that happened not to just one, but two towers. And there's footage of bombs exploding from bottom to top to achieve this.

How do you explain it ? Fuel exploding in a timely syncronized manner ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pjmktbt-F_Q

 

Aeroplanes my ass, I'm not dumb thank you. I can clearly see what's in front of my fucking face. Now notice that I'm not blaming the US for an inside job, I'm just blaming them for saying it was the plane impacts. Many engineers and physicists and still in shock how could the government brianwash people into buying that.


http://conspiracies.skepticproject.com/articles/911/twin-towers/page/4/#freefall

Seriously dude... read the website...

realize how dumb your opinion is

 

Searching that website, I see nothing about NSA: Why is that ? Oh, because it actually makes the USA look bad. Yes, I see clearly which type of website that is =)

You can also look at physics, and logic, and see how dumb your opinion is.



FrancisNobleman said:
Kasz216 said:
FrancisNobleman said:
curl-6 said:

Of course not, but when you fly planes into buildings, they collapse. This "inside job" nonsense is as silly as "aliens built the pyramids".


Buildings are prepared to witstand such colisions. Even if it was to collapse due to that, it wouldn't certainly happen in a perfectly vertical professional demolition. And that happened not to just one, but two towers. And there's footage of bombs exploding from bottom to top to achieve this.

How do you explain it ? Fuel exploding in a timely syncronized manner ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pjmktbt-F_Q

 

Aeroplanes my ass, I'm not dumb thank you. I can clearly see what's in front of my fucking face. Now notice that I'm not blaming the US for an inside job, I'm just blaming them for saying it was the plane impacts. Many engineers and physicists and still in shock how could the government brianwash people into buying that.


http://conspiracies.skepticproject.com/articles/911/twin-towers/page/4/#freefall

Seriously dude... read the website...

realize how dumb your opinion is

 

Searching that website, I see nothing about NSA: Why is that ? Oh, because it actually makes the USA look bad. Yes, I see clearly which type of website that is =)

You can also look at physics, and logic, and see how dumb your opinion is.

You can agree with him or not, but there is no need to start calling him names. Let's keep this civil!



Around the Network

Also, the lack of footage of "a plane going into the pentagon" is laughable.

"What ? The pentagon ? Like, our most important buildings ? Sorry bro, we've got no cameras on that shit"

Sure, a plane hit it, sure x)

I'm not retarded.



DJEVOLVE said:
As a American, I'm truly sorry for what my government does with these drones. I understand the need to go after the terrorist organizations. I think CIA tactics like, spy's infiltration is just fine. However just dropping random bombs from the sky doesn't help and if anything is creating more terrorist then it is stopping. So I apologize for my country's actions. Most of us do not agree with this and feel terrible for the innocent people getting killed or even hurt.

Happy Holidays from a Atheist. Help someone, donate, be nice and have a great holiday, no matter what you believe.

This

I wish more people realized this. Everytime the US government do something like this, it's just putting american people in more danger of having the events of 9-11 being repeated. Everything is becoming a circle of hate.



FrancisNobleman said:
Kasz216 said:
FrancisNobleman said:
curl-6 said:

Of course not, but when you fly planes into buildings, they collapse. This "inside job" nonsense is as silly as "aliens built the pyramids".


Buildings are prepared to witstand such colisions. Even if it was to collapse due to that, it wouldn't certainly happen in a perfectly vertical professional demolition. And that happened not to just one, but two towers. And there's footage of bombs exploding from bottom to top to achieve this.

How do you explain it ? Fuel exploding in a timely syncronized manner ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pjmktbt-F_Q

 

Aeroplanes my ass, I'm not dumb thank you. I can clearly see what's in front of my fucking face. Now notice that I'm not blaming the US for an inside job, I'm just blaming them for saying it was the plane impacts. Many engineers and physicists and still in shock how could the government brianwash people into buying that.


http://conspiracies.skepticproject.com/articles/911/twin-towers/page/4/#freefall

Seriously dude... read the website...

realize how dumb your opinion is

 

Searching that website, I see nothing about NSA: Why is that ? Oh, because it actually makes the USA look bad. Yes, I see clearly which type of website that is =)

You can also look at physics, and logic, and see how dumb your opinion is.

The NSA isn't a conspiracy.  The skeptic project is about disproving poorly thought out conspiracies.


As for physics and logic... no, nope.

They actually go through the physics right on that site... which is why, actual physicists and experts disagree with the conspiracy theroy.

 

Which is why conspiracy theorists are stuck quoting biologists and taking other quotes out of context.



FrancisNobleman said:
Also, the lack of footage of "a plane going into the pentagon" is laughable.

"What ? The pentagon ? Like, our most important buildings ? Sorry bro, we've got no cameras on that shit"

Sure, a plane hit it, sure x)

I'm not retarded.

Uh.  Except there totally is footage of the plane hitting the Pentagon.

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/12818225/

 

Outside which... security cameras teeeeend to face outwards, not inwards... and not face the fucking sky... using things like radar for that... so really it's not as unlikely as you'd think, considering i imagine they'd have people shooing away anyone trying to actually film the pentagon seeing it as an act of espinonage.

Nor would you actually you know... want to release that info if you plan to keep using the same building.

I mean, does the government release how it's been hacked into every time you find out it was?

 

 

Or to quote someone else....

 

. There is. That footage was released in 2006.

2. No, government buildings - particularly in 2001 - were not festooned with the kinds of very high-speed, high definition camera's aimed at the sky for what reason) that would have been REQUIRED to capture a useful image of Flight 77. Your perceptions are wrong.

3. Primary security at the Pentagon was and is foot patrols by the Pentagon Police, not some flunky sleeping behind a video monitor. Camera's are placed low where people enter and exit the building, not randomly at the sky.

4. The whole "where is the video" meme is a deliberate deception. It's purpose is to distract the credulous from the fact that:
a). 6 Radar sites positively tracked Flight 77 from take-off to impact with the Pentagon.
b). The Flight Data Recorder for Flight 77 was recovered at the Pentagon and its 25 hours of data exactly matches the radar data.
c). Large quantities of clearly identifiable aircraft debris positively identified with Flight 77 were recovered at the Pentagon site.
d). The DNA of every passenger and crew aboard Flight 77 were recovered from the Pentagon site. Some passengers were still strapped in their seats.
e). The impact path (downed light poles, a sheared-off tree, the dislocated power generator on the Pentagon lawn) all are consistent with impact by a Boeing 757.
f). 136 witnesses are on record as seeing Flight 77 hit the Pentagon. More importantly, zero witnesses are on record seeing ANYTHING else.

 

Takes a huge leap of logic to ignore all these facts.



Kasz216 said:
FrancisNobleman said:
curl-6 said:

Of course not, but when you fly planes into buildings, they collapse. This "inside job" nonsense is as silly as "aliens built the pyramids".


Buildings are prepared to witstand such colisions. Even if it was to collapse due to that, it wouldn't certainly happen in a perfectly vertical professional demolition. And that happened not to just one, but two towers. And there's footage of bombs exploding from bottom to top to achieve this.

How do you explain it ? Fuel exploding in a timely syncronized manner ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pjmktbt-F_Q

 

Aeroplanes my ass, I'm not dumb thank you. I can clearly see what's in front of my fucking face. Now notice that I'm not blaming the US for an inside job, I'm just blaming them for saying it was the plane impacts. Many engineers and physicists and still in shock how could the government brianwash people into buying that.


http://conspiracies.skepticproject.com/articles/911/twin-towers/page/4/#freefall

Seriously dude... read the website...

realize how dumb your opinion is.

They'll have something for pretty much every single wrong opinion someone fed you to sell their books to prey on peoples paranoia.


LIke Alex Jones.