bobfulci said:
OK, the website you provided seems to be an anonymous group of people who have an opinion. Whether that opinion actually makes sense is another question and just proves ot me that the skeptics are just as easily led as the people they claim to be "conspiracy theorist nutjobs." The bottom line is this, either you believe the official story 100% or you don't. I myself do not have a degree inb engineering so if what they claim is FACT, I would have no real way of making that determination. My belief is based soley on facts that make sense to me and a huge number of eyewitness testimony as well as major inconsistencies with the official account that cannot be easily dismissed (i.e. the jet engine at the pentagon not matching the jet that crashed into the building) and would be worthy of another look at the very least. Combine this with the fact that over 1400 demolitions experts and engineers are openly questioning the official story themselves and you have something worth looking at. http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_george_w_071221_top_scientists_and_s.htm |
Except... no. No they don't.
For example, the first person the article mentions? Dr. Lynn Margulis?
Dr. of BIOLOGY.
Who beleives AID's doesn't exist.
So.... she's not even a good Biologist.
The fact that they're leading with her... should tell you something.
Outside which... the skeptics project doesn't actually just post opinions... but actual videos you can look at that specifically prove the crackpot theroeis as...
well crackpot theories. It should be pretty obvious they're crackpot theories to anybody willing to look at the whole thing with anything close to resembling a critical logical eye.
Outside that.... the quotes from actual experts... have pretty much all been snippets taken out of context.









