By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - Drone strike on wedding party in Yemen kills at least 13 civilians

Yeah that is sad. Now compare it to the the thousands upon thousands of innnocents that terrorists have blown up.



Around the Network

a Drone fails to recognise a terrorist from a civilian? tell me something new... it is a fucking murder Death sentence to all them is the rigth choice.



34 years playing games.

 

tuscaniman99 said:
Yeah that is sad. Now compare it to the the thousands upon thousands of innnocents that terrorists have blown up.

What's your point? Do you think the USA raining hellfire all over the middle east has helped stop terrorism and curb the growth of extremist groups? It hasn't. If anything it's had the opposite effect, because accidents like these are the fuel to their propaganda.



curl-6 said:

Of course not, but when you fly planes into buildings, they collapse. This "inside job" nonsense is as silly as "aliens built the pyramids".


Buildings are prepared to witstand such colisions. Even if it was to collapse due to that, it wouldn't certainly happen in a perfectly vertical professional demolition. And that happened not to just one, but two towers. And there's footage of bombs exploding from bottom to top to achieve this.

How do you explain it ? Fuel exploding in a timely syncronized manner ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pjmktbt-F_Q

 

Aeroplanes my ass, I'm not dumb thank you. I can clearly see what's in front of my fucking face. Now notice that I'm not blaming the US for an inside job, I'm just blaming them for saying it was the plane impacts. Many engineers and physicists and still in shock how could the government brianwash people into buying that.



Yes, they're always 'civilians'



"Success really is decided at birth, and your life will never be better than it is right now. Sorry about that."

Around the Network
FrancisNobleman said:
curl-6 said:

Of course not, but when you fly planes into buildings, they collapse. This "inside job" nonsense is as silly as "aliens built the pyramids".


Buildings are prepared to witstand such colisions. Even if it was to collapse due to that, it wouldn't certainly happen in a perfectly vertical professional demolition. And that happened not to just one, but two towers. And there's footage of bombs exploding from bottom to top to achieve this.

How do you explain it ? Fuel exploding in a timely syncronized manner ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pjmktbt-F_Q

 

Aeroplanes my ass, I'm not dumb thank you. I can clearly see what's in front of my fucking face. Now notice that I'm not blaming the US for an inside job, I'm just blaming them for saying it was the plane impacts. Many engineers and physicists and still in shock how could the government brianwash people into buying that.


Tr00thar nonsense! Love it!



"Success really is decided at birth, and your life will never be better than it is right now. Sorry about that."

FrancisNobleman said:
curl-6 said:

Of course not, but when you fly planes into buildings, they collapse. This "inside job" nonsense is as silly as "aliens built the pyramids".


Buildings are prepared to witstand such colisions. Even if it was to collapse due to that, it wouldn't certainly happen in a perfectly vertical professional demolition. And that happened not to just one, but two towers. And there's footage of bombs exploding from bottom to top to achieve this.

How do you explain it ? Fuel exploding in a timely syncronized manner ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pjmktbt-F_Q

 

Aeroplanes my ass, I'm not dumb thank you. I can clearly see what's in front of my fucking face. Now notice that I'm not blaming the US for an inside job, I'm just blaming them for saying it was the plane impacts. Many engineers and physicists and still in shock how could the government brianwash people into buying that.


http://conspiracies.skepticproject.com/articles/911/twin-towers/page/4/#freefall

Seriously dude... read the website...

realize how dumb your opinion is.

They'll have something for pretty much every single wrong opinion someone fed you to sell their books to prey on peoples paranoia.



Teriol said:
a Drone fails to recognise a terrorist from a civilian? tell me something new... it is a fucking murder Death sentence to all them is the rigth choice.


Perhaps it's just the way you've written this, but i feel like you don't know what a drone is.

The drone doesn't have an AI or anything so it doesn't recognize anything.  They have pilots who make the calls.  The big difference between an airplane and a drone outside a drone being smaller and less well equipped, is that the pilot is just thousands of miles away.



Kasz216 said:
FrancisNobleman said:
curl-6 said:

Of course not, but when you fly planes into buildings, they collapse. This "inside job" nonsense is as silly as "aliens built the pyramids".


Buildings are prepared to witstand such colisions. Even if it was to collapse due to that, it wouldn't certainly happen in a perfectly vertical professional demolition. And that happened not to just one, but two towers. And there's footage of bombs exploding from bottom to top to achieve this.

How do you explain it ? Fuel exploding in a timely syncronized manner ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pjmktbt-F_Q

 

Aeroplanes my ass, I'm not dumb thank you. I can clearly see what's in front of my fucking face. Now notice that I'm not blaming the US for an inside job, I'm just blaming them for saying it was the plane impacts. Many engineers and physicists and still in shock how could the government brianwash people into buying that.


http://conspiracies.skepticproject.com/articles/911/twin-towers/page/4/#freefall

Seriously dude... read the website...

realize how dumb your opinion is.

They'll have something for pretty much every single wrong opinion someone fed you to sell their books to prey on peoples paranoia.

OK, the website you provided seems to be an anonymous group of people who have an opinion. Whether that opinion actually makes sense is another question and just proves ot me that the skeptics are just as easily led as the people they claim to be "conspiracy theorist nutjobs." The bottom line is this, either you believe the official story 100% or you don't. I myself do not have a degree inb engineering so if what they claim is FACT, I would have no real way of making that determination. My belief is based soley on facts that make sense to me and a huge number of eyewitness testimony as well as major inconsistencies with the official account that cannot be easily dismissed (i.e. the jet engine at the pentagon not matching the jet that crashed into the building) and would be worthy of another look at the very least. Combine this with the fact that over 1400 demolitions experts and engineers are openly questioning the official story themselves and you have something worth looking at.

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_george_w_071221_top_scientists_and_s.htm



Try to do at least ONE good deed everyday....

FrancisNobleman said:
curl-6 said:

Of course not, but when you fly planes into buildings, they collapse. This "inside job" nonsense is as silly as "aliens built the pyramids".


Buildings are prepared to witstand such colisions. Even if it was to collapse due to that, it wouldn't certainly happen in a perfectly vertical professional demolition. And that happened not to just one, but two towers. And there's footage of bombs exploding from bottom to top to achieve this.

How do you explain it ? Fuel exploding in a timely syncronized manner ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pjmktbt-F_Q

 

Aeroplanes my ass, I'm not dumb thank you. I can clearly see what's in front of my fucking face. Now notice that I'm not blaming the US for an inside job, I'm just blaming them for saying it was the plane impacts. Many engineers and physicists and still in shock how could the government brianwash people into buying that.