RolStoppable said:
MikeRox said:
You know the GBA was held back several years because Nintendo had no need to launch a new system right? So GBA actually sums up why competition is needed. PSP wasn't a sudden boom forwards in handheld tech, Nintendo just had no reason to progress whilst they had 95% marketshare.
|
I don't think the actual GBA was held back for several years, but even if it was, it was for the better. Historically, graphics on handhelds were about two generations behind home consoles, otherwise the trade-off with battery life and cost of the system was too big. So the GBA's SNES-like graphics in 2001 seem right on the money.
|
Historically they had parity. GameGear matched Master System, Lynx was more powerful than the Gamegear and Nomad matched Genesis.
However the drain on the battery and the form factor for this made it impractical and the Gameboy won out. Though even that was actually more powerful than the NES barring the monochrome LCD display.
It was only Nintendo's dominance and a lack of competition that led to handheld consoles being so underpowered in relation to home consoles. There has never been any technical reason for them being more than 1 generation behind. Heck, even the Nokia N-Gage as woefully conceived as it was, showed that PS1 visuals were perfectly viable even in 2003. It would take Nintendo another 2 years to release a handheld with similar power.
Don't get me wrong, Nintendo made shrewd business moves in not pushing technology whilst they had the entire market. Why bleed money into R&D and increased game development budgets? Also no amount of power, would ever match the quality of titles like Link's Awakening.
But SNES like graphics in 2001 was way behind the curve. The Nomad offered that in 1995.