farlaff said:
I have taken this from the first post you wrote:
I don't want to be a pain in the arse and you seem to be a nice folk. Sorry, then, if I insist on my point, but can you see how your argument has turned against you? If you yourself keep on doing things that you used to like growing old (as you have just admitted to do), then you are automatically excluded from the group of the "most people" you have affirmed that change. Thus, you have not grown up, just like everyone of us who llike Nintendo. Generalization is a dangerous thing and can even be offensive. |
exactly..I said most people change which they do, I never said every person changes every single thing about their entire life.
And the opposite of that certainly isnt 'people never grow up', they just retain selective hobbies while others change either with changes in society (e.g. glorification of violence), law (e.g. hunting), technology (e.g. simulation becoming mainstream), or any other factors.
I agree with you in saying generalisation is dangerous and thats why im debating this especially after you said your sig was from an investors report. with that mindset, how are they going to successfully cater to the millions of people who grew up without Nintendo? and what about all those who played nintendo games growing up but are not interested in them anymore?
in the OP you mentioned it could compete with the ps360, but the truth is they are not substitute products. The segments they appeal to are completely different. If someone wants to play mario, theyre not getting a ps360. If someone wants to play gear of war or god of war, theyre not getting a wii U. and just because they grew up with games like mario, it doesnt necessarily mean they still want to.








