DarthVolod said:
|
I don't mean to come off as insensitive, but aren't a lot of those things just normal parts of life that everyone goes through? Most kids are shy, and they can't read emotions because they lack the social experience/knowledge of an adult. Skills must be developed over time in the same fashion as a school subject like math or something ... you don't start in the 1st grade with calculus ... you need basic skills first.
Also, I believe everyone exists on the autism spectrum somewhere. No one is completely normal. It's just that some are over the threshold of symptoms to be clinically significant, i.e require extra support to be able to cope in mainstream education.
Also, is there anyone that does enjoy constant change? Most people have routines, and those that don't live pretty stressful lives. More change means more mental exertion and stress. Change can be good, but I have never heard of someone who thrives on constant change.
Everyone can be kind of obsessive about something or several things ... we all develop interests and hobbies this seems like something normal to me. For example, I collect videogames ... I have hundreds and I spend coutless hours cleaning them, categorizing them, updating a detailed log of which ones I have and don't have, etc. It is a hobby that brings me joy ... not a mental disorder, but an outsider who lacks an appreciation for such a hobby would probably consider it to be obsessive.
Sensory overload, I would imagine, works differently for everyone. As a child I can recall being really sensitive to loud noises. I would sometimes even leave movies or social events because there was just too much noise, and I felt overwhelmed. I don't really have that problem anymore, but I don't think my past experiences were indicative of any kind of mental disorder or instability ... just greater sensitivity I guess.
Giving patients powerful drugs to cure illnesses that can not be proven to exist outside of a subjective interview from a psychologist is so grossly negligent that I am surprised nobody considers it to be malpractice.
1. There's a massive incentive for doctors to get people on drugs 2. It can mitigate the symptoms of ADHD, Tourettes and the like that commonly present alongside Aspergers, and make the child manageable. But you're not doing the child any favours by sedating them.
|
|
|
I don't mean to sound insensitive but I really think you could benefit from doing a little more reading because at worst this comes off sounding like I don't understand this condition so therefore it doesn't really exist. Or at best, that it's just a variation of 'normal' which only serves to dimish it and make it harder for people who need help to seek it, either on behalf of themselves or their loved ones.
Autistic Spectrum Disorder (of which Asperger's Syndrome is a part) is a defined clinical syndrome with an genetic predisposition that has been well established through twin studies. It is categorised as a developmental disorder/delay, not a 'mental' disorder, but what it does have in common with many kinds of psychiatric illness is that, for now, diagnosis is clinical and not biochemical. Specifically the diagnosis of depression, anxiety disorders and schizophrenia is also clinical i.e. there is no discreet biochemical or imaging study that is diagnostic, it is based on objective clinical assessment against established criteria.
Similarly there is no discreet test for Alzhiemer's Disease but I think most people can intuitively understand there is a difference between not being able to remember the name of someone you met this morning versus not being able to remember your own name. Both are memory loss but the degree is vastly different. While some people with Asperger's are simply behind when it comes to developing social skills and social understanding, there are others that simply never develop those skills and understanding.
Having said all that ASD is also associated with measurable language disorder, motor abnormalities, and changes on MRI and PET scans and if recent research is to be believed there may actually be a genetically-based screening test for ASD within the next couple of years. However for now the diagnosis rests on clinical criteria alone and is only going to be as good as the clinician performing the assessment i.e. should be a specialist in the field of developmental disorders, not just a psychologist.
To suggest that most people exist somewhere on the Autistic Spectrum beacause they may have a few established routines, are a little change averse and get a bit overwhelmed from time to time grossly misrepresents the magnitude of what we are talking about.
I'll stop there.