DJEVOLVE said:
SlayerRondo said:
DJEVOLVE said:
SlayerRondo said:
roborad said: Honestly, I don't see how anyone can give a game a 2/5 unless it's just broken, super unpolished, and downright unplayable. It doesn't seem to be any of those things, I just see sess disliking the hack and slash old-school genre era. |
I see a 2/5 as being a game that is little fun to play.
You could make a game that runs perfectly, very polished and completely playable but if the game consist of boring and repetiative hack and slash gameplay then a 2/5 is well deserved.
|
You have a axe to grind. This is a horrible review. 2/5 is a broken game.
|
2/5 is a bad game that does what it intends to do poorly.
His review claims that Ryse became boring and repetiative after a couple of hours with a poor narrative to drive players onwards.
I would also like you to look to your signiture gif before claiming other people have an axe to grind.
|
Thats a 40% score. 40% is a completly broken game. He kept on about nothing new and repetitive. DId you even watch it. NO...
|
40 % is not completely broken. 0 % would be completely broken. You know, if the game doesn't work at all.
That said, gaming reviews are completely subjective. If that man feels the game is bad, he should give it a bad score. SImple as that. Just don't rely too much on reviews, because you will miss some games you would have really enjoyed. I stop caring about reviews a long time ago. I think Bioshock is shit and Duke Nukem Forever is nice. I also really like Final Fantasy XIII and I don't care about some reviews or something. I encourage you to do the same. Get Ryse. Have fun with it. But don't try to force some random folks on the internet to like it.