By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - NintenDomination - Sorry VGC, But Your Thread Is In Another Castle

 

Rate Conegamer's Reign

10 81 70.43%
 
9 4 3.48%
 
8 2 1.74%
 
7 3 2.61%
 
6 0 0%
 
5 1 0.87%
 
4 0 0%
 
3 0 0%
 
2 1 0.87%
 
1 8 6.96%
 
Total:100
DélioPT on 06 August 2014
AZWification said:
DélioPT said:
So, basically no Ubisoft support besides Just Dance?
I think bringing this AC game would be better than the Unity seeing as Rogue is old gen and people could buy it on Wii U and not have the inferior version.
To me, Rogue had a better chance of selling more on Wii U than a Unity port.

In the longrun, I think Ubisoft will support the WiiU with Just Dance, some another casual games, maybe Beyond Good & Evil 2 and Rayman ( Legends did sell pretty well on the WiiU)! Not the best support, but still better than nothing I guess! :-/

Problem is Ubisoft is already delaying a completed game because the userbase isn`t big enough for them to make the money they want. And we are talking about a game that fits the Nintendo market.

I don`t think Ubisoft will just release JD games on Wii U, but another game will probably take it`s time.
How big does the Wii U userbase needs to be for Ubisoft? That`s the question that only Ubisoft knows the answer to.



Around the Network
AZWification on 06 August 2014
DélioPT said:

Problem is Ubisoft is already delaying a completed game because the userbase isn`t big enough for them to make the money they want. And we are talking about a game that fits the Nintendo market.

I don`t think Ubisoft will just release JD games on Wii U, but another game will probably take it`s time.
How big does the Wii U userbase needs to be for Ubisoft? That`s the question that only Ubisoft knows the answer to.

Hopefully we'll find out the answer to that question as soon as possible! :-/



                
       ---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---

DélioPT on 06 August 2014
AZWification said:
DélioPT said:

Problem is Ubisoft is already delaying a completed game because the userbase isn`t big enough for them to make the money they want. And we are talking about a game that fits the Nintendo market.

I don`t think Ubisoft will just release JD games on Wii U, but another game will probably take it`s time.
How big does the Wii U userbase needs to be for Ubisoft? That`s the question that only Ubisoft knows the answer to.

Hopefully we'll find out the answer to that question as soon as possible! :-/

Agreed!



Clyde32 on 06 August 2014

We may not have even been in this situation if Rayman Legends wasn't delayed, so it's their fault(and EA's) to begin with.



Raziel123 on 06 August 2014

Hmm this is interesting
That shop i recently talked about that did a 199€ flash sale on a Wii U bundle is gonna have flash sales starting at midnight
i'll keep an eye out on both the Wii U and the Vita...whoever gets a discount first (if any of them do) will be the one I get...



Around the Network
Ninsect on 06 August 2014
Clyde32 said:
We may not have even been in this situation if Rayman Legends wasn't delayed, so it's their fault(and EA's) to begin with.

But then we can go one step further and ask ourselves why Rayman was delayed



The One and Only

VizionEck.com

Clyde32 on 06 August 2014
Ninsect said:
Clyde32 said:
We may not have even been in this situation if Rayman Legends wasn't delayed, so it's their fault(and EA's) to begin with.

But then we can go one step further and ask ourselves why Rayman was delayed

Because the games EA put on the Wii U didn't sell well so EA jumped ship. Therefore Ubisoft decided that they should delay it and make it multiplat.



Ninsect on 06 August 2014
Clyde32 said:
Ninsect said:
Clyde32 said:
We may not have even been in this situation if Rayman Legends wasn't delayed, so it's their fault(and EA's) to begin with.

But then we can go one step further and ask ourselves why Rayman was delayed

Because the games EA put on the Wii U didn't sell well so EA jumped ship. Therefore Ubisoft decided that they should delay it and make it multiplat.

What does EA have to do with Ubisoft? Almost every 3rd party publisher has abandoned WiiU. Ubisoft were one of the last ones actually so you can't really blame them.



The One and Only

VizionEck.com

Clyde32 on 06 August 2014
Ninsect said:
Clyde32 said:
Ninsect said:
Clyde32 said:
We may not have even been in this situation if Rayman Legends wasn't delayed, so it's their fault(and EA's) to begin with.

But then we can go one step further and ask ourselves why Rayman was delayed

Because the games EA put on the Wii U didn't sell well so EA jumped ship. Therefore Ubisoft decided that they should delay it and make it multiplat.

What does EA have to do with Ubisoft? Almost every 3rd party publisher has abandoned WiiU. Ubisoft were one of the last ones actually so you can't really blame them.

EA were the first to jump ship. After everyone was jumping ship, the sales of the Wii U stopped because of the dry spell. Ubisoft saw this, and instead of ending the dry spell, they just extended it. 



Ninsect on 06 August 2014
Clyde32 said:
Ninsect said:

What does EA have to do with Ubisoft? Almost every 3rd party publisher has abandoned WiiU. Ubisoft were one of the last ones actually so you can't really blame them.

EA were the first to jump ship. After everyone was jumping ship, the sales of the Wii U stopped because of the dry spell. Ubisoft saw this, and instead of ending the dry spell, they just extended it. 

It was a snowball effect, sure, but it was not the publishers jumping ship that kept the snowball rolling. It was the low sales almost all of them were seeing.



The One and Only

VizionEck.com