By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Infinity Ward CONFIRMS Ghosts on Xbox One is 720p (upscaled), 1080p on PS4

curl-6 said:
iamdeath said:

Gamerds don't agree.................see wii-u. They stopped evolving years ago, living off their name only.

 Wii U's low sales are because it does not have those typically great Nintendo games yet, they are still in the pipes.

Besides which, I do not need other people to tell me what to think or validate my opinion, I am capable of thinking for myself.


Didn't Gamecube and N64 had great games??? I believe they had (I played lots of them), and that didn't stopped them from selling less than 40M each... So you are really talking nonsense... Ninty games are great, but they haven't evolved or keep trends... you may say you don't like were gaming is headed, and that is why you preffer Ninty (that is fine, it's your taste and your right), but please don't pretend that their games have evolved and diversified more than the others.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Around the Network
curl-6 said:
iamdeath said:
curl-6 said:
iamdeath said:

That's what you are doing...................

No. I am giving a logical explanation for the disparity between the resolutions and the power gap. You're the one who's constantly butting in about "PS4 is more powerful" trying to start an argument.

Who are you trying to fool?? Praise nintendo every chance you get, downplay everything sony....please. The ps4 is more powerfull, what is there to argue?

I certainly do not downplay everything Sony, you just think I do because you're a very defensive Sony fan.

Again, you're so caught up in trying to start a fight you're ignoring what the issue under discussion was; that the resolution gap exceeds the power gap, with the most logical explanation being Xbone's more difficult architecture.

Funny thing is that most Xbone supporters were saying that Xbone was just as easy to develop, Eram was a kill, MS is great with drivers (directx throw in all discussions) and they know how to make OS (well never heard of really good OS from them)...

But when 2 third parties come they excuse is the opposite of what they preached a week before... the next step they may accept the HW is weaker and be happy with it, as many were happy with PS2 and Wii no matter they were the weaker in the gen (with PS2 having the excuse that having been released earlier)



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

iamdeath said:

Yet Curl_6 keeps arguing and posting long after i"m gone...hmmmmm...

 

Nintendo is so far behind, it is sad really. Only the fad of motion controls with the wii temporarily gave thm a reprieve, with the wii-u it's back to irrelevance.

My posts with Xen after you left were not argument, they were light hearted flirtation. ;)

Nintendo have never been irrelevant, and if they keep making great games, they never will be.



DonFerrari said:
curl-6 said:
iamdeath said:

Gamerds don't agree.................see wii-u. They stopped evolving years ago, living off their name only.

 Wii U's low sales are because it does not have those typically great Nintendo games yet, they are still in the pipes.

Besides which, I do not need other people to tell me what to think or validate my opinion, I am capable of thinking for myself.


Didn't Gamecube and N64 had great games??? I believe they had (I played lots of them), and that didn't stopped them from selling less than 40M each... So you are really talking nonsense... Ninty games are great, but they haven't evolved or keep trends... you may say you don't like were gaming is headed, and that is why you preffer Ninty (that is fine, it's your taste and your right), but please don't pretend that their games have evolved and diversified more than the others.

Sales do not equal quality.

Evolution does not mean following the trends of others. NIntendo evolve in their own direction.



DonFerrari said:
curl-6 said:
iamdeath said:
curl-6 said:
iamdeath said:

That's what you are doing...................

No. I am giving a logical explanation for the disparity between the resolutions and the power gap. You're the one who's constantly butting in about "PS4 is more powerful" trying to start an argument.

Who are you trying to fool?? Praise nintendo every chance you get, downplay everything sony....please. The ps4 is more powerfull, what is there to argue?

I certainly do not downplay everything Sony, you just think I do because you're a very defensive Sony fan.

Again, you're so caught up in trying to start a fight you're ignoring what the issue under discussion was; that the resolution gap exceeds the power gap, with the most logical explanation being Xbone's more difficult architecture.

Funny thing is that most Xbone supporters were saying that Xbone was just as easy to develop, Eram was a kill, MS is great with drivers (directx throw in all discussions) and they know how to make OS (well never heard of really good OS from them)...

But when 2 third parties come they excuse is the opposite of what they preached a week before... the next step they may accept the HW is weaker and be happy with it, as many were happy with PS2 and Wii no matter they were the weaker in the gen (with PS2 having the excuse that having been released earlier)

I am not an Xbone supporter.



Around the Network
curl-6 said:
DonFerrari said:
curl-6 said:
iamdeath said:

Gamerds don't agree.................see wii-u. They stopped evolving years ago, living off their name only.

 Wii U's low sales are because it does not have those typically great Nintendo games yet, they are still in the pipes.

Besides which, I do not need other people to tell me what to think or validate my opinion, I am capable of thinking for myself.


Didn't Gamecube and N64 had great games??? I believe they had (I played lots of them), and that didn't stopped them from selling less than 40M each... So you are really talking nonsense... Ninty games are great, but they haven't evolved or keep trends... you may say you don't like were gaming is headed, and that is why you preffer Ninty (that is fine, it's your taste and your right), but please don't pretend that their games have evolved and diversified more than the others.

Sales do not equal quality.

Evolution does not mean following the trends of others. NIntendo evolve in their own direction.

Yep, and their own directio n will lead to their irrelevance.



iamdeath said:
curl-6 said:

Sales do not equal quality.

Evolution does not mean following the trends of others. NIntendo evolve in their own direction.

Yep, and their own directio n will lead to their irrelevance.

Only if they stop making great games, which I can't see happening any time soon.



curl-6 said:
iamdeath said:
curl-6 said:

Sales do not equal quality.

Evolution does not mean following the trends of others. NIntendo evolve in their own direction.

Yep, and their own directio n will lead to their irrelevance.

Only if they stop making great games, which I can't see happening any time soon.

They have not made a new great IP in over a decade...................They are on their way to irrelevance.



iamdeath said:
curl-6 said:
iamdeath said:
curl-6 said:

Sales do not equal quality.

Evolution does not mean following the trends of others. NIntendo evolve in their own direction.

Yep, and their own directio n will lead to their irrelevance.

Only if they stop making great games, which I can't see happening any time soon.

They have not made a new great IP in over a decade...................They are on their way to irrelevance.

Xenoblade was a great new IP.



curl-6 said:
DonFerrari said:
curl-6 said:
iamdeath said:

Gamerds don't agree.................see wii-u. They stopped evolving years ago, living off their name only.

 Wii U's low sales are because it does not have those typically great Nintendo games yet, they are still in the pipes.

Besides which, I do not need other people to tell me what to think or validate my opinion, I am capable of thinking for myself.


Didn't Gamecube and N64 had great games??? I believe they had (I played lots of them), and that didn't stopped them from selling less than 40M each... So you are really talking nonsense... Ninty games are great, but they haven't evolved or keep trends... you may say you don't like were gaming is headed, and that is why you preffer Ninty (that is fine, it's your taste and your right), but please don't pretend that their games have evolved and diversified more than the others.

Sales do not equal quality.

Evolution does not mean following the trends of others. NIntendo evolve in their own direction.

Not said you are a xbone supporter (i clearly know you aren't), I just said that this arguments are flipped whenever is convenient...

Well, most Wii supporters were using the sales excuse to say they had a better product, but I won't discuss in this side... I'm discussing you saying that WiiU haven't saw great sales because it doesn't have great games yet, and I said that GC and N64 had great games but weren't commercial sucesss (what is a shame)... so even if WiiU have great games it isn't guaranteed that they will suceed... and Ninty core followers may not be much more than what they had in GC and N64 (and will have in WiiU), and the casuals that entered in Wii will be spread between the 3 consoles, portables, tablets and smartphones, got it?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."