By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
curl-6 said:
iamdeath said:

Gamerds don't agree.................see wii-u. They stopped evolving years ago, living off their name only.

 Wii U's low sales are because it does not have those typically great Nintendo games yet, they are still in the pipes.

Besides which, I do not need other people to tell me what to think or validate my opinion, I am capable of thinking for myself.


Didn't Gamecube and N64 had great games??? I believe they had (I played lots of them), and that didn't stopped them from selling less than 40M each... So you are really talking nonsense... Ninty games are great, but they haven't evolved or keep trends... you may say you don't like were gaming is headed, and that is why you preffer Ninty (that is fine, it's your taste and your right), but please don't pretend that their games have evolved and diversified more than the others.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."