curl-6 said:
Sales do not equal quality. Evolution does not mean following the trends of others. NIntendo evolve in their own direction. |
Not said you are a xbone supporter (i clearly know you aren't), I just said that this arguments are flipped whenever is convenient...
Well, most Wii supporters were using the sales excuse to say they had a better product, but I won't discuss in this side... I'm discussing you saying that WiiU haven't saw great sales because it doesn't have great games yet, and I said that GC and N64 had great games but weren't commercial sucesss (what is a shame)... so even if WiiU have great games it isn't guaranteed that they will suceed... and Ninty core followers may not be much more than what they had in GC and N64 (and will have in WiiU), and the casuals that entered in Wii will be spread between the 3 consoles, portables, tablets and smartphones, got it?

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







