Yes, every fact you said was true. Your interpretation of them is the problem. Does it matter that the Wii U games have bad review scores? Sure, but how do you know the 4BONE games also won't get bad reviews? They aren't out yet so bringing up reviews is mostly irrelevant. Building a PC for a comparable price doesn't matter either, unless you only care about graphics. Your Wii U spec'd PC would not be playing any of the exclusives I listed. Also I never said nor implied the graphics are the same on all next gen systems, but merely this close to launch that the differences are irrelevant to all but the guy obsessed with graphics. I have indeed forgotten a bunch of multiplats, only because I literally forgot them. If you do the work and form a table in similar format to the one in my post, I'll amend the op. It's actually not unfair. Does it matter TO YOU THE CONSUMER if the system is 1 year old or 100 years old? Indirectly of course as technology and the world keeps advancing, but there is nothing coherently wrong with a product that's been on the market longer. By that math 4BONE have one and a half exclusives per month, which is very similar to the Wii U.

Paragraphs cost extra ;)

While it's true that none have been reviewed yet, I can almost guarentee all the exclusives coming out will get at leat 8's with maybe one or two exceptions. And no, the differences is graphics are not irrelevant. It's a fact that a game is more enjoyabe when crap isn't appearing in front of you because the system can actually render it in time. Or they can run at a higher res because objects will be less aliased. Games are better when they have better graphics for so many reasons. And yes a table saying that all three systems are better than current gen without stating how much better than current gen they are is, in fact, the epitome of misleading. to mislead means to give the wrong idea or impression, which is the definition of almost everything you've posted on your tables. For future reference in a debate/argument: When you correct someone's grammar or spelling, you are making a very petty jab that does nothing but take away legitamacy from YOUR argument. It shows that you don't have much to say on the actual content, so you go to attacking surface level errors that really mean nothing. If a candidate in a presidential debate said the the 2nd candidate's tie looks stupid after the latter candidate had answered a question well, the legitamcy of whatever the first candidate said would immediately drop significantly. I basically see it as you acknowledging that I brought up valid points so thank you. Also, the Ps4 is by easily worth more than 33% more than the wiiu, even diregarding the superior powe because of extra features.  

That's a whole lot of nothing you're coming up with^

Is this BOLD about the paragraphs remark?

That's nothing to do with grammar or spelling, it just makes a wall of text less appetizing.

I already have one...

The problem is that there's absolutely nothing that interests me in the Wii U exclusives. Too kiddy, too casual, as per usual with Nintendo. Being a Mario-head is the only way to justify that console.

SSB says hello

Bayonetta says hi

"X" says whats up!? (Just as good if not better than any PS4/X1 title)

ZombiU says Yooo 

MK says Great Racing

Fire Emblem x SMT says not casual :-/

Super Mario 3D World says, your going to be missing out on the best 3D platformers

Sonic Lost World says, im not mario but my game is just as good lol

and lastly Donkey Kong says "Think My Game Is Casual? Bet You cant even beat a level without losing a life o.O

They looked about the same to me in this demo - still jaggies, and some simmer from not enough Anti Aliasing.   Not as good as a Dolphin emmulator it seems.

Endless Ocean 3 will be a horror game about finding underwater sea munsters - for that game I might actually buy a WiiU!

The tablet might be fine, but my 720P laptop bothers me with it's low res.  I know, I'm spoiled, but that's the way it is.