Nope still hilarious!  This is the website that gave Killzone 3 a 5/10.  Not only that but he didn't mention a downgrade once.  

As for 60 FPS "Locked In"  :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBjWP8EKmf8&feature=player_embedded#t=17

Even the 360 version dropped to the low 40's several times.  I guess COD isn't 60 FPS then huh?  

Xbox Go Home.

Its hard for me to see that most people at least on this site that always preach higher numbers as being the end of in any discussion.  As to the fail part, the fail is in your understanding.  How is not taking out something to achieve something else not a downgrade.  IF GG was able to keep all the effects they have in the singleplayer and maintain 60FPS in the MP then you can say its now a downgrade.  If they need to remove or sub something less intensive or drop any features its a downgrade in the graphics.  Notice I said Graphics because thats where the understanding part is required.

I will show you because you mentioned it in comparison to Forza a lot.  I will not waste this thread with it.  Drive Club looks better to YOU which you seem to forget is an opinion not a statement of fact.  I watch the vidoes for drive club, from screen tearing to popin to low muddy shadows.  If those float your boat or you just ignored than fine.

Last topic on Drive Club, the developer can target whatever they want, when they actually do it is when you can thump your chest.  Last statement from the developer is that the game is locked at 30fps.

You have no clue what was missed.  This is pure opinion.  You have no clue if its limitation in the hardware or just a totally change in direction for the complete game assets.  As for making a claim, was the main character running at those levels when shone at E3 or more to the point when they talked about game assets at the autodesk event.  If this was the case then there was no lying.  If a developer decides to change direction well, by golly they have that right.  There is nothing to pin on them since the game is not out.

The only problem I have with bias is when people make claims as if they are facts instead of their view point or opinion.  I do not see you pinning KZ for mostly 60fps.  You take their word that this will not effect your gameplay but we will see when the game release.  What I find is that people are less critical of their platform of choice while they nick pick the other for anything preceived as a defect.

Just show any evidence that when they decided to push MP @60fps they took out things that had on SP... or you can accept that it always had less effect and that is what permited them to push fps

Please put it really clear that you are including yourself in the comments about nitpicking and over defending, because you are doing this in this thread and others.

This was confirmed when the machine next to mine froze and the blurring could be seen on the static screen. The technical shine many will come here expecting at launch will have been saved for the single player campaign. It’s not unusual for multiplayer to take a hit in its graphical prowess to keep things running smooth. Here the focus was on maintaining a constant frame rate which did visibly dip at times.

Like I said. Don't say a game is 60FPS when the shit has framrate problems and constant dips. That goes for anyone.

I will be the first to state I am nick picking but its on a certain point.  Its a very big pet peeve of mind when I see gamers always calling developers liars.  It riles me up when those same gamers cannot provide any proof and the only thing they can do is point out some statement where they stated one thing at the beginning of development and another when they are about to release.  Games always go under changes during development and the fact people who probably did not care about a game to begin with latch on to one statement and make a big deal out of it has to be brought out for what it is.