By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Bayonetta 2 Reportedly Runs in 1080p 60fps

curl-6 on 13 September 2013
LilChicken22 said:

Mario Kart 8 and Smash Bros Wii U look better than Bayonetta 2 I think and also runs at 1080/60fps. Why wouldn't Bayonetta do the same?

Smash Bros U is a much simpler game graphically than Bayo 2 from what we've seen so far. There's much less action going on at once, less detailed character models, less detailed environments, less visual effects, etc.



Around the Network
irstupid on 13 September 2013
withdreday said:
MohammadBadir said:
withdreday said:
orniletter said:
withdreday said:
 

Woops, so many Japanenese publishers are bankrupt these days, I got them confused.

But Sega can't afford them especially. I'd be shocked if it wasn't being ported as we speak (or type...)

Than be prepared to be shocked, Sonic Colours never left the Wii, as did MadWorld ( even developed by Platinum too)

I would be shocked if it would leave the WiiU knowing about Nintendo GameCube exclusives that never resurfaced on anything besides Nintendo (Resident Evil Remake, Zero, Metal Gear Solid: The Twin Snakes etc.)

Those latter games had exclusive deals tied to them from the start and there's been no word whether this has one attached too, so I’d guess it doesn’t. And those other titles never left the Wii because...well...there just wasn't that much of a following for them. I somehow just don't see people clamoring for Sonic Colors and Mad World to grace their systems, so there's really no reason for them to port those.

Plus for each exclusive that you named that didn't leave the platform, there have been several major ones that have (RE4 anyone?), so really, it's a coin flip.

I say it will eventually for one simple reason: Because of the lack of success of the Wii U. If they don't port it, they're flat out leaving money on the table, and if you think they're going to risk closing their doors as a studio just to remain loyal to one company, then you’ve got another thing coming.

If it does stay exclusive though, it’ll be that way only because they couldn’t afford to port it to the other consoles, not because they don't want to spite Ninty. It's just too costly these days for their to be true 100% third party exclusives which is why they're so rare.

the difference between something like Bayonetta 2 and RE4 is that Nintendo paid for 100% of the games' development, and i think they pretty much "own" the Bayonetta 2 name, kinda like how they own the MGS: Twin Snakes' rights because they paid for the game development.

Remember the GTAIV DLC though? That was funded by Microsoft and it launched on PS3 and PC a mere 1 year later. And reportedly ME1 was too. All I'm saying is don't be too disappointed if this game jumps ship. There's a better chance that it's ported than it not.

The only way it will be 100% not coming to other platforms is if it manages to scratch out decent sales on the system which is yet to be seen. If it tanks, I say look for a port soon thereafter.

 

Apparantly you missed the topics related to the tweets that BAYONETTA devolopers sent out saying "quit asking about Bayonetta on other consoles, its 100% up to Nintendo, ask them"



withdreday on 13 September 2013
irstupid said:
withdreday said:
MohammadBadir said:
withdreday said:
orniletter said:
withdreday said:
 

Woops, so many Japanenese publishers are bankrupt these days, I got them confused.

But Sega can't afford them especially. I'd be shocked if it wasn't being ported as we speak (or type...)

Than be prepared to be shocked, Sonic Colours never left the Wii, as did MadWorld ( even developed by Platinum too)

I would be shocked if it would leave the WiiU knowing about Nintendo GameCube exclusives that never resurfaced on anything besides Nintendo (Resident Evil Remake, Zero, Metal Gear Solid: The Twin Snakes etc.)

Those latter games had exclusive deals tied to them from the start and there's been no word whether this has one attached too, so I’d guess it doesn’t. And those other titles never left the Wii because...well...there just wasn't that much of a following for them. I somehow just don't see people clamoring for Sonic Colors and Mad World to grace their systems, so there's really no reason for them to port those.

Plus for each exclusive that you named that didn't leave the platform, there have been several major ones that have (RE4 anyone?), so really, it's a coin flip.

I say it will eventually for one simple reason: Because of the lack of success of the Wii U. If they don't port it, they're flat out leaving money on the table, and if you think they're going to risk closing their doors as a studio just to remain loyal to one company, then you’ve got another thing coming.

If it does stay exclusive though, it’ll be that way only because they couldn’t afford to port it to the other consoles, not because they don't want to spite Ninty. It's just too costly these days for their to be true 100% third party exclusives which is why they're so rare.

the difference between something like Bayonetta 2 and RE4 is that Nintendo paid for 100% of the games' development, and i think they pretty much "own" the Bayonetta 2 name, kinda like how they own the MGS: Twin Snakes' rights because they paid for the game development.

Remember the GTAIV DLC though? That was funded by Microsoft and it launched on PS3 and PC a mere 1 year later. And reportedly ME1 was too. All I'm saying is don't be too disappointed if this game jumps ship. There's a better chance that it's ported than it not.

The only way it will be 100% not coming to other platforms is if it manages to scratch out decent sales on the system which is yet to be seen. If it tanks, I say look for a port soon thereafter.

 

Apparantly you missed the topics related to the tweets that BAYONETTA devolopers sent out saying "quit asking about Bayonetta on other consoles, its 100% up to Nintendo, ask them"

Of course they're going to deny it. Bioware denied a PS3 port even though PS3 data was found in the source code down to the very day, so you can't go by that alone. They want as many people to buy this version as possible. They don't want people waiting for it to be ported to their systems. And they probably said that so people would quit pestering them anyway.

But boy am I going to laugh if it is ported though. Some people are getting way too attached to game like it's the savior of the Wii U or something. This game will not make or break the Wii U.

If it does, they're toast anyway.



irstupid on 13 September 2013
withdreday said:
irstupid said:
withdreday said:
MohammadBadir said:
withdreday said:
orniletter said:
withdreday said:
 

Woops, so many Japanenese publishers are bankrupt these days, I got them confused.

But Sega can't afford them especially. I'd be shocked if it wasn't being ported as we speak (or type...)

Than be prepared to be shocked, Sonic Colours never left the Wii, as did MadWorld ( even developed by Platinum too)

I would be shocked if it would leave the WiiU knowing about Nintendo GameCube exclusives that never resurfaced on anything besides Nintendo (Resident Evil Remake, Zero, Metal Gear Solid: The Twin Snakes etc.)

Those latter games had exclusive deals tied to them from the start and there's been no word whether this has one attached too, so I’d guess it doesn’t. And those other titles never left the Wii because...well...there just wasn't that much of a following for them. I somehow just don't see people clamoring for Sonic Colors and Mad World to grace their systems, so there's really no reason for them to port those.

Plus for each exclusive that you named that didn't leave the platform, there have been several major ones that have (RE4 anyone?), so really, it's a coin flip.

I say it will eventually for one simple reason: Because of the lack of success of the Wii U. If they don't port it, they're flat out leaving money on the table, and if you think they're going to risk closing their doors as a studio just to remain loyal to one company, then you’ve got another thing coming.

If it does stay exclusive though, it’ll be that way only because they couldn’t afford to port it to the other consoles, not because they don't want to spite Ninty. It's just too costly these days for their to be true 100% third party exclusives which is why they're so rare.

the difference between something like Bayonetta 2 and RE4 is that Nintendo paid for 100% of the games' development, and i think they pretty much "own" the Bayonetta 2 name, kinda like how they own the MGS: Twin Snakes' rights because they paid for the game development.

Remember the GTAIV DLC though? That was funded by Microsoft and it launched on PS3 and PC a mere 1 year later. And reportedly ME1 was too. All I'm saying is don't be too disappointed if this game jumps ship. There's a better chance that it's ported than it not.

The only way it will be 100% not coming to other platforms is if it manages to scratch out decent sales on the system which is yet to be seen. If it tanks, I say look for a port soon thereafter.

 

Apparantly you missed the topics related to the tweets that BAYONETTA devolopers sent out saying "quit asking about Bayonetta on other consoles, its 100% up to Nintendo, ask them"

Of course they're going to deny it. Bioware denied a PS3 port even though PS3 data was found in the source code down to the very day, so you can't go by that alone. They want as many people to buy this version as possible. They don't want people waiting for it to be ported to their systems. And they probably said that so people would quit pestering them anyway.

But boy am I going to laugh if it is ported though. Some people are getting way too attached to game like it's the savior of the Wii U or something. This game will not make or break the Wii U.

If it does, they're toast anyway.

The didnt' deny it, they flat out said that any ports or anything would NOT be up to them.  Nintendo owns the freaking game.  Nintendo is the only company who can make the decision to port the game.



osed125 on 13 September 2013
withdreday said:

Of course they're going to deny it. Bioware denied a PS3 port even though PS3 data was found in the source code down to the very day, so you can't go by that alone. They want as many people to buy this version as possible. They don't want people waiting for it to be ported to their systems. And they probably said that so people would quit pestering them anyway.

But boy am I going to laugh if it is ported though. Some people are getting way too attached to game like it's the savior of the Wii U or something. This game will not make or break the Wii U.

If it does, they're toast anyway.

I'm going to link this post so that everyone can just shut up...

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=5662791



Nintendo and PC gamer

Around the Network
RazorDragon on 13 September 2013
withdreday said:

Of course they're going to deny it. Bioware denied a PS3 port even though PS3 data was found in the source code down to the very day, so you can't go by that alone. They want as many people to buy this version as possible. They don't want people waiting for it to be ported to their systems. And they probably said that so people would quit pestering them anyway.

But boy am I going to laugh if it is ported though. Some people are getting way too attached to game like it's the savior of the Wii U or something. This game will not make or break the Wii U.

If it does, they're toast anyway.


Man, this game is not going out of the Wii U unless Nintendo says so. They funded the development. They didn't published or funded only some parts of the game, they funded the entire development of it and the publishing costs, therefore, it's going to stay with Nintendo no matter what you think or believe. I don't see what's so hard to understand about that.



withdreday on 14 September 2013
irstupid said:
withdreday said:
irstupid said:
withdreday said:
MohammadBadir said:
withdreday said:
orniletter said:
withdreday said:
 

Woops, so many Japanenese publishers are bankrupt these days, I got them confused.

But Sega can't afford them especially. I'd be shocked if it wasn't being ported as we speak (or type...)

Than be prepared to be shocked, Sonic Colours never left the Wii, as did MadWorld ( even developed by Platinum too)

I would be shocked if it would leave the WiiU knowing about Nintendo GameCube exclusives that never resurfaced on anything besides Nintendo (Resident Evil Remake, Zero, Metal Gear Solid: The Twin Snakes etc.)

Those latter games had exclusive deals tied to them from the start and there's been no word whether this has one attached too, so I’d guess it doesn’t. And those other titles never left the Wii because...well...there just wasn't that much of a following for them. I somehow just don't see people clamoring for Sonic Colors and Mad World to grace their systems, so there's really no reason for them to port those.

Plus for each exclusive that you named that didn't leave the platform, there have been several major ones that have (RE4 anyone?), so really, it's a coin flip.

I say it will eventually for one simple reason: Because of the lack of success of the Wii U. If they don't port it, they're flat out leaving money on the table, and if you think they're going to risk closing their doors as a studio just to remain loyal to one company, then you’ve got another thing coming.

If it does stay exclusive though, it’ll be that way only because they couldn’t afford to port it to the other consoles, not because they don't want to spite Ninty. It's just too costly these days for their to be true 100% third party exclusives which is why they're so rare.

the difference between something like Bayonetta 2 and RE4 is that Nintendo paid for 100% of the games' development, and i think they pretty much "own" the Bayonetta 2 name, kinda like how they own the MGS: Twin Snakes' rights because they paid for the game development.

Remember the GTAIV DLC though? That was funded by Microsoft and it launched on PS3 and PC a mere 1 year later. And reportedly ME1 was too. All I'm saying is don't be too disappointed if this game jumps ship. There's a better chance that it's ported than it not.

The only way it will be 100% not coming to other platforms is if it manages to scratch out decent sales on the system which is yet to be seen. If it tanks, I say look for a port soon thereafter.

 

Apparantly you missed the topics related to the tweets that BAYONETTA devolopers sent out saying "quit asking about Bayonetta on other consoles, its 100% up to Nintendo, ask them"

Of course they're going to deny it. Bioware denied a PS3 port even though PS3 data was found in the source code down to the very day, so you can't go by that alone. They want as many people to buy this version as possible. They don't want people waiting for it to be ported to their systems. And they probably said that so people would quit pestering them anyway.

But boy am I going to laugh if it is ported though. Some people are getting way too attached to game like it's the savior of the Wii U or something. This game will not make or break the Wii U.

If it does, they're toast anyway.

The didnt' deny it, they flat out said that any ports or anything would NOT be up to them.  Nintendo owns the freaking game.  Nintendo is the only company who can make the decision to port the game.

Boy I bet you're going to be incredibly disappointed if and when this game gets ported. Like I said, it's not even this big of a deal. It's Bayonetta, not MGS5 or something. If it doesn't get ported, 99% of gamers will do just fine without it.

And the 2 people that care about the series this much will just buy a Wii U. People need to quit acting like their lives depend on this not being ported to next gen consoles. It wasn't even that much major of a franchise to begin with.

MDMAlliance on 14 September 2013
withdreday said:
irstupid said:

The didnt' deny it, they flat out said that any ports or anything would NOT be up to them.  Nintendo owns the freaking game.  Nintendo is the only company who can make the decision to port the game.

Boy I bet you're going to be incredibly disappointed if and when this game gets ported. Like I said, it's not even this big of a deal. It's Bayonetta, not MGS5 or something. If it doesn't get ported, 99% of gamers will do just fine without it.

And the 2 people that care about the series this much will just buy a Wii U. People need to quit acting like their lives depend on this not being ported to next gen consoles. It wasn't even that much major of a franchise to begin with.

 


Well, no.  It wont get ported.  Do you really think Nintendo would allow that?  Legally it can't happen unless Nintendo lets it happen.  I don't see that happening any time in the forseeable future.  So the chance Bayonetta 2 will get ported to anything but a Nintendo console is something so astronomically low that it isn't even worth considering.  Just because it happened before with a different company doesn't mean it has a chance of happening.  

Also about your second point, it's not about how big it is.  It's about having quality exclusives.



EricFabian on 14 September 2013

Thus thread just lols. Why is so hard to believe that Bayo2 Will never leave Wii U?



hsrob on 14 September 2013

Every bloody Bayonetta 2 threads devolves into this tired cyclicle debate. (It would be great if people could just talk about the game)

A: This game looks great.  Will probably get ported though, Nintendo fans don't like this kind of game.

B: This game won't get ported, Nintendo paid for it.

A: Yeah but other games have been ported after promised exclusivity.

B: Nintendo paid for the whole game from start to finish, without Nintendo there was never going to be a Bayonetta 2, Sega didn't want to make it.

A: Yeah, but it will probably get ported.

C: How? Why would Nintendo do that?

A: How do you know it won't.  Anyway it's just Bayonetta, it's not that good, it's not going to save the WiiU

B: It's effectively a Nintendo game, no one said it would, but it could still be a great game.

A: Yeah but it's going to sell like crap and.....then it'll get ported.