That's not very nice of Ubi. I was planning on buying it for PS3 or WiiU anyway.

That's really not the point, because if people do that the Vita version won't sell. Which justifies less support. 

So we're in the same scenario we are in now.

Not cool. I really wonder who decided it was ok for them to cut out that much content and what were their thoughts during this process.

That explains the lower price I guess.

DamnnnnYummm! Im surprised WiiU didn't get the same treatment . Thats a real slap to the handheld market, hey look at the bright side! Vita has 90+ more levels than the 3DS :0

"Hey Jacques, I'm having trouble putting these last 30 levels into a 4 GB cart!"

"Relax Jean! Just don't bother including them!"

"Are you sure that's a good idea Jacques? Won't Vita owners be annoyed?"

"What Vita owners? And besides, if people were going to buy the $40 version of a game that costs $60 on its native platform, they should consider themselves lucky to get 75% of the content."

"Good point Jacques! Now that we're done with the Vita port, wanna work on the offline coop for the Wii U version of Splinter Cell?"

"Sure thing, mon ami!"

*Jacques and Jean go walking off into the sunset, where they also discuss their company's relationship with PC gamers*

But Rol, as a Vita owner, I have far better options from Sony's studios! Like Killzone! And Tearaway! And whatever else Sony is making for the Vita! Why should I care about other companies' games when they suck or are dumbed down, especially as a multiple-platform owner?

LOL that made me laugh thanks!

No matter how we look at it, 28 is a large number

its pratically 75% of the console version, at least its 2/3 the price.... Still not good however