By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - Xbox One CPU Clocks In At ~1.9GHz

A_C_E on 29 August 2013
the-pi-guy said:
realgamer said:
bananaking21 said:

are you saying ethomaz is a troll? and provide me examples of all of these posts you are claiming he posts? 


Dose he work for Microsoft or owned Xbox one console second he heard a news said its BS how does he knows its BS he got a proof ? 

He was talking about the explanation, not the CPU clock, he even basically said it could be right.  He said that the explanation makes no sense.  

It seems that people who are exclusively fans to a system of choice over-react when another person debunks or corrects that persons favored company. It happens on both sides. In Ethomaz' case he never debunked or criticized the clock speed, just the explanation of the clock speed. According to some people in here that makes Ethomaz a troll......k. Ethomaz came up with actual explanations and everyone else provided nothing other a troll alert and try to do it in good fashion.

Its sad that a fan of one system enlightens fans of another and they turn around to call BS on him just because hes a fan another system.



Around the Network
TheSting on 29 August 2013

 


crissindahouse on 29 August 2013

almost all posts in this thread are based on only one sentence ethomaz said. pretty great achievement ethomaz



BHR-3 on 29 August 2013

i dont know anything about this news, cpus, or ethomaz grammer but im awaiting to see the outcome of this bet between him and nsanity



                                                             

                                                                      Play Me

ethomaz on 29 August 2013

TheSting said:

Damn seriously man? How long was this conversation? 3 way? Conference call? Can anyone else back this up? Is this true?

The AMD at GamesCom?

It was close door but you can read here: http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Gamescom-Playstation-4-bietet-Unified-Memory-Xbox-One-nicht-1939716.html

Even the official PR from MS saying the spokesperson made inaccurate statements.

http://www.nowgamer.com/news/2052820/ps4_vs_xbox_one_amd_retracts_performance_comparison.html



Around the Network
pbroy on 29 August 2013

Everyone needs to relax. ethomaz actually explained why he thought the OP was wrong. Not on his first post, which he should have done. Which made it seem like he was trolling. Then he dodged my question, which was probably due to language barrier. He's not saying the speed is wrong. He's saying how the OP came up with that speed is wrong. I have no idea if it's true, because I have no knowledge in this matter. What you guys are doing is wrong though. This is not a witch hunt. Be civil.

VGChartz♥♥♥♥♥FOREVER
Xbone... the new "N" word   Apparently I troll MS now | Evidence | Evidence
ethomaz on 29 August 2013
BHR-3 said:

i dont know anything about this news, cpus, or ethomaz grammer but im awaiting to see the outcome of this bet between him and nsanity

I'm waiting mods response but nobody replayed yet.



Nadwki on 29 August 2013
pbroy said:

Everyone needs to relax. ethomaz actually explained why he thought the OP was wrong. Not on his first post, which he should have done. Which made it seem like he was trolling. Then he dodged my question, which was probably due to language barrier. He's not saying the speed is wrong. He's saying how the OP came with that speed is wrong. I have no idea if it's true, because I have no knowledge in this matter. What you guys are doing is wrong though. This is not a witch hunt. Be civil.

Well said! 



Adinnieken on 29 August 2013
ethomaz said:

No. I'm not trolling... I just like the things right without lies.

The first bold: what happened is just that... MS gets mad because the AMD comment at Gamescom (it was not a comments at all.. it was a presentation from AMD)... MS didn't like that then called them and AMD said "I won't comment anything more about consoles". I think MS is right... it is AMD fault to give example that sound like downplaying the other side... but in fact hUMA or not that's doesn't matter because the MS soluction can works better than AMD.

The second bold: I give you information about what make his assumptions wrong... the clock can be true but not because his assumptions.

I can make you accpect what I'm talking but he explanation is... I give you a example using his logic the CPU/GPU are syncronous and runs 1.7Ghz and 853Mhz (this clock can be true but it is bullshit too)... fact (AMD documentation) the CPU, HT, NB, GPU clocks in APU are not syncronized... each part have their own clock.

The 128bits bus width fits better than any explanation.

So I will ask something... what make him you says I'm wrong and him not?

I never said you were wrong.  I never said you were right.  I said prove it.

You're saying a respected analyst, who works for a firm advising investors on the subject of semi-components is saying something false or misleading.  His creditials speak volumes.  Yours are unknown. 



Mmmfishtacos on 29 August 2013

How does this change any thing?