By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ethomaz said:

No. I'm not trolling... I just like the things right without lies.

The first bold: what happened is just that... MS gets mad because the AMD comment at Gamescom (it was not a comments at all.. it was a presentation from AMD)... MS didn't like that then called them and AMD said "I won't comment anything more about consoles". I think MS is right... it is AMD fault to give example that sound like downplaying the other side... but in fact hUMA or not that's doesn't matter because the MS soluction can works better than AMD.

The second bold: I give you information about what make his assumptions wrong... the clock can be true but not because his assumptions.

I can make you accpect what I'm talking but he explanation is... I give you a example using his logic the CPU/GPU are syncronous and runs 1.7Ghz and 853Mhz (this clock can be true but it is bullshit too)... fact (AMD documentation) the CPU, HT, NB, GPU clocks in APU are not syncronized... each part have their own clock.

The 128bits bus width fits better than any explanation.

So I will ask something... what make him you says I'm wrong and him not?

I never said you were wrong.  I never said you were right.  I said prove it.

You're saying a respected analyst, who works for a firm advising investors on the subject of semi-components is saying something false or misleading.  His creditials speak volumes.  Yours are unknown.