By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Who do you think is the most recognizable video game character?

 

Who's more recognizable?

Mario 553 82.78%
 
Luigi 2 0.30%
 
Pac-Man 65 9.73%
 
Sonic 9 1.35%
 
Crash 5 0.75%
 
Spyro 1 0.15%
 
Snake 11 1.65%
 
Other 22 3.29%
 
Total:668
Vetteman94 said:
MDMAlliance said:
Vetteman94 said:
For all those saying it cant be argued, allow me.

Pac-man is in the record books as the most recognizable character in video games.

There that was easy.

So I will say it is easily Pac-man, without a shadow of a doubt.


Says a random person on the Internet with no source to back it up.

Also, polls can be misleading.  Both of my parents know Mario, but only one of them would know pac-man.  

A LOT of the younger generation will not know pac-man, but almost all of them will know Mario.  

Pretty much any gamer would know both.  This puts Mario in the lead.  Seriously, you have Mario in many places where video games are not.  

Also, it's quite easy to see that googling Mario gives you many times more results than googling Pacman does.  

Your anecdotal evidence proves that Mario is more recognized?   Both my parents have no clue who Mario is,  My mother owns a Wii and bought me my original NES and she still doesnt know who he is.  But both my parents know who Pac-Man is.   Soo there you go my anecdotal evidence is much better proof because i say so.........     

Or I could use proof of what i say.  

http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/7000/most-recognizable-videogame-character

If it was so easy to google all that, how come it was so tough to google most recognized video game character?  

There is your proof.  a simple search found it with ease.   You probbaly did find it but you didnt want to post it to prove yourself wrong.    


I did look that up FYI. I also saw two problems with the data.  #1 it said AMERICAN CONSUMERS. #2 the difference was 1%, and there's ALWAYS a margin of error. 

Oh, and my anecdote was not meant to be proof, idiot. It was simply to serve the point that pacman isn't as big as you're making it. My internet is down so I can't reply to you fully right now. 

Moderated,

-Mr Khan



Around the Network
MDMAlliance said:
Vetteman94 said:

Your anecdotal evidence proves that Mario is more recognized?   Both my parents have no clue who Mario is,  My mother owns a Wii and bought me my original NES and she still doesnt know who he is.  But both my parents know who Pac-Man is.   Soo there you go my anecdotal evidence is much better proof because i say so.........     

Or I could use proof of what i say.  

http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/7000/most-recognizable-videogame-character

If it was so easy to google all that, how come it was so tough to google most recognized video game character?  

There is your proof.  a simple search found it with ease.   You probbaly did find it but you didnt want to post it to prove yourself wrong.    


I did look that up FYI. I also saw two problems with the data.  #1 it said AMERICAN CONSUMERS. #2 the difference was 1%, and there's ALWAYS a margin of error. 

Oh, and my anecdote was not meant to be proof, idiot. It was simply to serve the point that pacman isn't as big as you're making it. My internet is down so I can't reply to you fully right now. 

No need for petty insults. 

I do understand there is a margin of error,  but it goes both ways.  If the margin of error is 3%, which is probably normal, sure Mario could be ahead by 2 %, but he could also be behind 4%.   So margin of error means nothing really.   



Probably the first time this was officially done was around 1993 back then Sonic was the most recognise character/ mascot overall, gaming related and otherwise, ahead of Mario and even beating out Disney's Mickey Mouse. Thanks to Sega's marketing blitz back then. Sonic and crew had a cartoon series was in numerous ads he was pratically everywhere!!............... fast forward to now ......... well he sure had better days.



I saw the Guinness report a few years back, and while it's clearly only based on statistical data (unless someone believes that they surveyed every human being on planet earth, lol) it doesn't surprise me that Pac Man is so popular.

Many people here may be too young to realize just how big Pac Man was when it debuted in the '80s. In the same way that Super Mario Bros is largely responsible for home gaming becoming mainstream, the arcade of Pac Man is largely responsible for mainstream acceptance of video games in general. It was a bigger phenomenon than Pong, Space Invaders or Donkey Kong, IMO. Since there is anecdotal evidence going around in this thread, allow me to present this:

When I was 5 or 6 years old was when I first saw Pac Man. I had seen arcade games before that, but I never gave more than a passing glance to a person or two (usually kids or teens) playing one. Then in late 1980 or early '81 is when one of the local grocery stores got a Pac Man arcade unit.

As my mom and I got into the checkout line, I noticed about half a dozen people surrounding an arcade machine at the store's exit. I noticed a kid come up to one of the checkers and ask for change to get quarters. As we left I saw kids and teens huddled all around it, but that wasn't all. There were adults who had stopped to see what it was and were curiously checking it out as well - moms with their shopping carts, a man in a business suit... nobody had ever seen anything like it. It reminds me of the stories we hear about the crowds that the first Pong unit drew back in the '70s (and probably Space Invaders in Japan). It was happening all over again. It was the game that got me into gaming; after witnessing the sights and sounds on screen I couldn't stop thinking about it and bugged my mom that night to take me back to the store later when there would be less people so that I could actually try it. I didn't have to pester her much though because she was curious to play it as well.

I know... "cool story bro", but my point is to illustrate that Pac Man was the Wii Sports of its day, no doubt, and it was everywhere in pop culture for much of that entire decade. Even with Mario being present in Donkey Kong/DK jr, Mario Bros, Super Mario Bros and the record breaking SMB3, I would still credit Pac Man as being more recognizable in the mainstream... back then.

Having said all of that, the undeniable fact is that Pac Man, unlike Mario, has simply not had sustained popularity for almost three full generations of people now. In fact, after Ms Pac Man the character's popularity became a bit dormant once the late '80s/early '90s hit until Championship Edition debuted in 2007.

Bottom line, there is no concrete way to prove who the most recognizable video game character is. All we can do is make assumptions based on logic, and in doing that I believe the answer is Mario due to the sheer number of games (including spin-offs, of course) that he has been in, in addition to the fact that his popularity and pop culture recognition has never wavered (and has in fact increased) since his debut.



Mario ffs. His little musical jingles a lot of people could probably hum them. I see loads of people go to costume parties as Mario. I never see Pac-man bed sheets, Easter eggs, mugs, Christmas advent calendars, year calendars, post is, t-shirts etc but Mario is on all of these and more. Guinness world records means shit. My older relatives actually ask if im playing "Mario" when see me playing any video game console! He's just so synonymous with gaming.



Around the Network
Vetteman94 said:
MDMAlliance said:


I did look that up FYI. I also saw two problems with the data.  #1 it said AMERICAN CONSUMERS. #2 the difference was 1%, and there's ALWAYS a margin of error. 

Oh, and my anecdote was not meant to be proof, idiot. It was simply to serve the point that pacman isn't as big as you're making it. My internet is down so I can't reply to you fully right now. 

No need for petty insults. 

I do understand there is a margin of error,  but it goes both ways.  If the margin of error is 3%, which is probably normal, sure Mario could be ahead by 2 %, but he could also be behind 4%.   So margin of error means nothing really.   

All of your posts are condescending not only to me, but to pretty much anyone who doesn't share your answer.  

The thing is that the statistic seemed to be counting only Americans and only "consumers," which could easily be only people who play video games.  That in itself skews the data.  When we count people who don't even play games or are not these "consumers" I doubt more of them know pacman.  I do know Pacman is popular, but simply knowing how much Mario is seen outside of gaming compared to Pacman gives Mario the definitive advantage.



My 2 year old daughter knows who Mario is. Doesn't get much more casual than that.



If I'm not mistaken the only corporate icon that is more recognizable than Mario is Mickey.



lionel messi



Pac Man was called Puck Man in UK when it was released I believe... plus there is a new pac man show



Talal said:
I will permaban myself if the game releases in 2014.

in reference to KH3 release date