3 4K monitors, and all I can see is blur on the side monitors, even on the tiny screenshot. What's the point...
I prefer a multi projector setup with blending software and a curved screen. If only I had the space and money for this
3 4K monitors, and all I can see is blur on the side monitors, even on the tiny screenshot. What's the point...
I prefer a multi projector setup with blending software and a curved screen. If only I had the space and money for this
| SvennoJ said: 3 4K monitors, and all I can see is blur on the side monitors, even on the tiny screenshot. What's the point... |
It's called the Fish-eye effect and can be fixed by adjusting the fov, which they obviously didn't do.
| nnodley said: I'm think about having 3 screens at some point, but I'm confused by how many graphics cards I would need or whatever. I know 1 wouldn't be enough but would 2 suffice or do I have to have a graphics card for every screen? I currently have 1 gtx 680. I'm pretty illiterate when it comes to tech too. |
2x Geforce 680's should be more than enough for triple 1080P screens, provided your PSU can keep up. (The article was only running a 750w potentially no-name PSU on 3x Radeon 7970's and wondered why they ran into problems, not to mention the crap Antec 900 case.)
Essentially, just keep adding a Geforce 680 untill your performance is adequate.
But even at 5760x1080 you might be pleasently surprised how many games you can run at 60fps with a single Geforce 680.
Also if you are not very tech literate, then don't go triple monitor, you might go bald in the process!

www.youtube.com/@Pemalite
| Pemalite said:
2x Geforce 680's should be more than enough for triple 1080P screens, provided your PSU can keep up. (The article was only running a 750w potentially no-name PSU on 3x Radeon 7970's and wondered why they ran into problems, not to mention the crap Antec 900 case.) |
Thanks for the info! I'm pretty sure I have a 750w PSU. That's should be enough or should I try and find one that's over 800w just to be on the safe side?
Why are they called 4k tv's? None of the numbers are 4,000? Also we at the moment call the HD tv's by 1080p or 720p. THe 1080 and 720 are the lower number in the resolution. So why now are they using the higher number?
It's all just misleading bullshit, imo.
11520x2160=24,883,200 pixels. Where are they getting their 1.5 BILLION pixel math?
@lightofhonor 25 Million pixels *60 frames=1.5 Billion Pixels per second.
Its a misleading headline
| lightofhonor said: 11520x2160=24,883,200 pixels. Where are they getting their 1.5 BILLION pixel math? |
Pixels per second, welcome to marketing speak! haha
nnodley said:
Thanks for the info! I'm pretty sure I have a 750w PSU. That's should be enough or should I try and find one that's over 800w just to be on the safe side? |
PSU wattage *is* important, but the brand/quality is just as important too.
For example a Corsair HX/AX can easily output loads greater than they are advertised as. (I.E. 850w outputting 900w etc'.)
Where as something like a 1,000w Shaw PSU will literally catch on fire if you even try half of it's rated load.
I ran my system on a Corsair HX 850 for months with my current set-up, granted I did some undervolting to lower power consumption.
Plus, if you want to save energy, getting a PSU that's power efficient at your systems idle/load can be important to.

www.youtube.com/@Pemalite
I just got back from my friend's house. He purchased an 80" Vizio M-Series Razer LED TV. That thing is the most ridiculous TV I've ever seen. He also already has his Xbox One paid for. I can't wait to play some Forza and KI on it.
I posted this earlier today...
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=165292&page=1#
But its cool...your thread is prettier, and you got a Nicholas Cage avatar. Win win!