attaboy said:
|
LMAO!
attaboy said:
|
LMAO!
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Yes, if a person is naturally violent or apart of a gang or even lives a life of crime, they are a thug. In other words a menace to society. Technically speaking, Treyvon wasn't a thug, he is what in highschool my friends called a burnout. The word thug is just pressed upon African-American's and Hispanic-American's when they slip up in society. |
don't you think there is something disturbing about your last statement?
| attaboy said:
You might be right. Some say Z-Man's wife just wants some of the donation money. Some say Zimmerman swoops in like Superman to save starving orphans in burning vehicles. Others say Zimmerman shot Martin Luther King. From the outside, all we can do is speculate and joke. It's fun, though! |
lol. All i know though are the facts. Which say she refused to give a statement without a lawyer present and the police spokesperson saying that zimmerman was cooperating and that he was released because there was no victim or crime. I find it funny though. An altercation probably happened. The threatening with a gun? Probabky not or else there would be charges. You can bet your ass on that. The number 1 wanted man in america. First person to convict him of anything will be a hero
tres said:
|
Do you live in America?
What I don't get is that trayvon was wearing a hoodie, don't they live in Florida? Why need a hoodie....this would autmatically make you look like a suspect no matter if your black or white in my opinion!

| Lyrikalstylez said: What I don't get is that trayvon was wearing a hoodie, don't they live in Florida? Why need a hoodie....this would autmatically make you look like a suspect no matter if your black or white in my opinion! |
It was in feb at night. Im sure the temperature justified the hoodie
Max King of the Wild said:
lol. All i know though are the facts. Which say she refused to give a statement without a lawyer present and the police spokesperson saying that zimmerman was cooperating and that he was released because there was no victim or crime. I find it funny though. An altercation probably happened. The threatening with a gun? Probabky not or else there would be charges. You can bet your ass on that. The number 1 wanted man in america. First person to convict him of anything will be a hero |
I'm going to have to disagree with you on that one. No idea what did or did happen between the two but I'm personally familiar with situations where the police were called, there was obvious evidence that an altercation had happened and still no charges were filed. Cops number one priority isn't making an arrest. That's the last thing they want to do besides discharge their firearms (good cops, that is). They just want to keep the peace. In fact, unless the complainant wants to make a charge, often times no action is taken. If there's severe or traumatic injury, then the officer will probably take it upon himself. It isn't about right or wrong. It's really about what you think you can prove in court. No officer wants to go to court and look like a fool due to lack of evidence. This latest Zimmerman situation wasn't even just her word against his. There was at least one other victim/witness!
| attaboy said:
I'm going to have to disagree with you on that one. No idea what did or did happen between the two but I'm personally familiar with situations where the police were called, there was obvious evidence that an altercation had happened and still no charges were filed. Cops number one priority isn't making an arrest. That's the last thing they want to do besides discharge their firearms (good cops, that is). They just want to keep the peace. In fact, unless the complainant wants to make a charge, often times no action is taken. If there's severe or traumatic injury, then the officer will probably take it upon himself. It isn't about right or wrong. It's really about what you think you can prove in court. No officer wants to go to court and look like a fool due to lack of evidence. This latest Zimmerman situation wasn't even just her word against his. There was at least one other victi |
the thing is Z was detained. I bet you no cops made the decision to arrest or not and it was the DAs call. To which he probably refused. The cops usually dont have a say who gets charges brought up. Thats the DA.
Also the police spokesperson said there was no victim or crime... just must be another incompetant police force in florida eh? (How many times will that be used)
Max King of the Wild said:
the thing is Z was detained. I bet you no cops made the decision to arrest or not and it was the DAs call. To which he probably refused. The cops usually dont have a say who gets charges brought up. Thats the DA. |
Nah, cops do have the say. DA's a busy man. Doesn't get involved in things like traffic, domestic disputes, etc. He's there for the big stuff. The officers have the option of going to the magistrate judge for anything not traffic related and pleading their case. Then he'll decide to if there's enough evidence . At least that's how it is in my area.