Watched it, it means nothing. It's just one guys opinon. The fact of the matter is Zimmerman has a criminal history and Trayvon didn't other than minor stuff from school and speculation about crimes, but Zimmerman is a full blown felon, look it up. So on that fact alone, the whole bases on that is wrong.

And if you're seriously posting this guys opinon as fact then it's not surprising you don't know how to embed. Just saying...

What are you talking about? SO MANY IGNORANT PEOPLE ON HERE!

He was cleared of Manslaughter as well. They tried to get him on both.

Wait, where the hell did you get all that from? Zimmerman was the one that came up to him as evidenced by the 911 operator telling Zimmerman not to approach in which he did anyway. So he engaged the conflict, not Travon.

What I love about Zimmerman supporters is they just LOVE to make sht up. You weren't there so stop pretending you were. You make yourself look surpremely stupid by just making up the story as you go to fit the argument. One simple fact check shows that you post is full of BS.

He was cleared of a secondary charge of manslaughter, but if the primary charge was manslaughter the case would've been much shorter because the whole case would've revolved around that charge itself. Second degree murder is much harder to prove because you have to find intent. Voluntary manslaughter demands intent as well...but not involuntary manslaughter, which fits the bill of Zimmermans case.

Not in regards to Florida law it doesn't.  Florida is a "Perfect Self Defense" state.

In oterwords, if you can claim self defense you can't be found guilty of any crime.

As long as there is reasonable doubt that says Martin might of started the fight, Zimmerman is in the clear.

The lack of even defensive wounds on ZImmerman's hands more or less sealed the deal on him flying out of any charges.  

You basically had witnesses showing Trayon beating on Zimmerman, and nothing to suggest zimmerman ever even fought back during the whole beating until he shot back.

Though you are banned for being insulting I will still explain to you how you are wrong.

Well, you admit you didn't read the full article but yet made claims on the partial information.... that is exactly what misinformation is. Why should I address any other portion of your post when I have already proven that it is faulty. Lets work on getting correct information before we talk about anything else.

I'm glad to see you are already banned.

The video presents FACTS with supporting evidence. Only the last part was speculation/opinion.

Also, you are wrong. Zimmerman's record was clean except for one offense where he assaulted an off duty police officer who was confronting his friend. The off duty cop never made himself known to be a police officer. The charges were dropped. Can you show where this magical criminal history is of George Zimmerman's?

Also, I know how to embed quite well, buddy. I was posting from my cell phone, though, which this website does not have a mobile format and is a pain to navigate. I could have embedded it at any time. In fact, I'll go back to the OP and do it right now, just for you so you can see it when you get back from your ban :)

As I said, it's only misinformation if I had kept presenting it as fact. I admitted I was off and corrected it, so that's that. It seems to me you're just ignoring the rest just out of convenience, not because of that.

The fact of the matter is it doesn't even matter rather the charge was reduced or not. Those various run ins with the law showed that Zimmerman has aggression issues and it lines up with the fact that he most likely engadged the conflict as evidenced by the mentioned 911 call telling him to not pursue and he proceeded anyway.

He might not be a "racist" (or at least not an open one) but what he is for sure is a murderer, assbackwards "stand your ground" law or not.