They're almost all the same games man, so there's not much point to this thread.
Xbox has Halo, so Xbox wins. Interestingly enough, PS3 also didn't get Metro 2033. Not sure why.
They're almost all the same games man, so there's not much point to this thread.
Xbox has Halo, so Xbox wins. Interestingly enough, PS3 also didn't get Metro 2033. Not sure why.
Even though i love killzone and resistance it doesn't offer the options that halo does, map builder, split screen multiplayer, split screen co-op...
Then the 360 has gears and early map packs for cod and battlefield, so the obvious answer is 360.
Why are you guys just skirting around the real issue? Which has the best JRPGs, which has the best FPS? BORING! What people want to know is which one tastes best with apple jelly?
They both share 90% of the same shooter library except that the Shooter Box has Halo and the Shooterer Box has Killzone, MAG, and Resistance.
I thoroughly enjoyed Resistance 2 and Killzone 3, but thats about it for shooters on the PS3.

| attaboy said: They both share 90% of the same shooter library except that the Shooter Box has Halo and the Shooterer Box has Killzone, MAG, and Resistance. |
Love how you only mention Halo for the Xbox and then list a heap more for the Playstation as if the platform needs defending. :P
But just for amusement at any rate you did forget Gears of War, Metro, Left 4 Dead amongst others on the "Shooter box" which IMHO are superior games as they are a little more PC centric. (Minus Gears of course.)

www.youtube.com/@Pemalite
Anything that has guns are considered FPS now. Some people can't stand guns on games because they're not turn based.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
















